1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Wittaler [7]
3 years ago
5

The answer I need this by tomorrow):

History
1 answer:
KatRina [158]3 years ago
8 0
Northeast Groups: Trappers, Farmers, Hunters :In the northeast of North America

Southeast Groups: Nomadic hunters and farmers, pretty sure also fishers: South East of North America

Northwest Groups: Fishersmen : Northwest of North America

Southwest Groups: Nomadic Hunters and farmers, they fish too i think..?: Southwest of North America

Great Basin Group: Nomadic Hunters and Gatherers: Around the Nevada area

California Group: Hunters and Fishers: California.

Plateau Group: Hunters and gatherers, maybe fishers? : around idaho and wyoming and a bit north of that

Great Plains Group: Hunters and Farmers that tended to migrate alot: In the center of the US ish

Arctic (This also includes Sub-Arctic): Hunters and Fishers: Just most of canada and above

So there are nine, see which ones ring a bell, I guess

You might be interested in
how were the Christan humanist writers of the northern renaissance different from the humanist writers of the italian renasissan
weeeeeb [17]

Answer:The christian humanist writers of Northern Renaissance in their writings criticized the religion while as Italian Renaissance writers used to write about the religion in a sacred way. Secondly we see the writings of Northern Renaissance revolved around humanistic ideals while as the subject matter of most Italian Renaissance writers was religious and non- secular.

Explanation: Can i please have brainliest

6 0
3 years ago
" The War Begins." Question 1: The battle of _________ meant the end of an uneasy peace. Question 2: What was the risk to the Un
aalyn [17]

Answer:

<em>Q1</em><em>)</em><em> </em>The<em> </em><em>COLD</em><em> </em><em>WAR</em>

Explanation:

The Cold War was an uneasy peace after World War II,

8 0
3 years ago
What were the two major minerals for mining in Texas in the late 1800s
Dvinal [7]

salt, industrial sand and gravel, lime, and masonry cement, account for more that 95 percent of the state's nonfuel mineral value

4 0
3 years ago
''The British Empire was a force for good in India.” How far do you agree with this statement?
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

uh, nowhere. They were HORRIBLE

Why not, you may ask?

- The Jallianwala Bagh Massacre

- By 1890 about 6,000 British officials ruled 250 million Indians

- Racism was also reflected in the penal code. There had never been a taboo against homosexuality in Indian culture and practice until the British Victorians introduced one.

- Britain also helped solidify and perpetuate the iniquities of the caste system, which was a horrible division of people.

- Religion became a useful means of divide and rule, with the fostering of a two-nation theory that eventually divided the country and made partition inevitable; one million were killed and 17 million displaced.

- Winston Churchill, widely heralded as one of the greatest brits was viciously racist and perpetuated hardline racism in British colonies around the world, once saying: “I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion . . . Let the Viceroy sit on the back of a giant elephant and trample Gandhi into the dirt.”

- Up to 35 million died unnecessarily in famines; London ate India’s bread while India starved, and in 1943 nearly four million Bengalis died. It was their own fault, according to Churchill, for “breeding like rabbits”.

and that's barely skimming the surface. The sheer number of atrocities Britain has committed in India established its legacy as being one of genocide, tyranny, cultural theft and erasure. The few positive things its presence accomplished are far outweighed by the sick acts it carried out on the Indian people.

7 0
3 years ago
Research the new methods of warfare used during WW I.
Korvikt [17]

Answer:

New Weapons

Explanation:

World war 1 introduced the Airplane such as the Sopwith Camel and Folker Triplane. Also machine guns and Chemical weapons such as mustard gas were introduced into the battlefield. And tanks

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • As part of his Reconstruction plan, President Johnson thought the South should be treated
    14·2 answers
  • How did the political parties affect voter turnout when they were stronger
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is true about the Okanogan Highlands?
    13·2 answers
  • What is the main reason polonius is wary of hamlet's intentions towards ophelia?
    7·1 answer
  • How did new scientific discoveries in the sixteenth and seventeenth century improve people's lives and lead to the growth of cap
    8·1 answer
  • Who holds the power to add a referendum to a ballot?
    10·1 answer
  • What Was The cause of The fall of The roman empire
    9·2 answers
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • Which group of Americans was most prosperous in the immediate post world war lol period
    7·1 answer
  • Scheduling of elections is determined by the National Government *<br> True<br> False
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!