<em>B. They believed that Parliament had no right to tax them as they had no direct representation in that legislative body.</em>
Explanation:
The Stamp Act was passed by the British Parliament and was put onto the colonists, this meant that many paper products had a tax on them. This did not make the colonists happy whatsoever.
After the Stamp Act got passed, many colonists were angered by this and thought it was not fair. The colonists had the argument, "taxation without representation", as they had nobody to vouch for them in British Parliament and make sure things were going smoothly. Great Britain argued that the tax money was going towards paying for the French and Indian War, which was very expensive. They also made the point that the colonists were being protected by British soldiers, so they should not complain that they were being taxed.
Even after Great Britain made these points, the colonists still did not want to be taxed and still said it was unfair. Many ended up boycotting paper products and other items that had the tax on them and in some cases, things ended up getting violent. Products ended up getting burned, British merchants were being hurt, the colonists were fed up and wanted the tax to stop.
Eventually, Great Britain realized the Stamp Act was doing more harm than good. Many British merchants were losing money and the colonists were still angered, which caused the Stamp Act to get repealed shortly after.
Answer:
the built palisades and moats
Answer:
theres multiple answers to it
Explanation:
so probably A. but im very sorry if i get it wrong like super sorry
Answer: Allowing interstate commerce to be dominated by powerful monopolies.
Explanation:
Here's the complete question:
All who recall the condition of the country in 1890 will remember that . . . the country was in real danger from another kind of slavery . . . that would result from the aggregations of capital in the hands of a few individuals and (businesses) controlling, for their own profit and advantage exclusively, the entire business of the country, including the production and sale of the necessaries of life." —Supreme Court Justice John Marshall Harlan, 1911
In this excerpt, Justice Harlan is warning against —
John Marshall Harlan, was an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from from 1877 till when he died in 1911.
In this excerpt, Justice Harlan is warning against allowing interstate commerce to be dominated by powerful monopolies.
He believes that when interstate commerce is left in the hands of few, powerful individuals, it is a form of slavery as the businesses will only look to extort the people and make more profit and do things that'll only be beneficial to them.
Answer:
1. equality and economic justice through socialism
2. a gradual decline in the government providing education and healthcare
3. shared resources and cooperation among people
Explanation:
I know 1. equality and economic justice through socialism and 3. shared resources and cooperation among people are correct... and that <em>5. private ownership of the means of production</em> is <u>INCORRECT</u>... and with a communist society, it depends on there being an all powerful and dictating government of sorts so it wouldn't be <em>4. a gradual decline in the need for a government </em>so that leaves 2.
