Answer:
No,
Explanation:
In united States, the right to bear fire arms is protected under the 2nd amendment of the constitution.
The only situation where a person can legally be thrown out from a certain social setting is if that person is directly disrupt the activity in that group with the weapon.
From the passage above, the student who held the concealed weapon does not seems to actively do something that disrupt others. This make the class does not have any legal / solid ground to kept that student out.
Explanation:
what is the answer I will answer it I'm not scamming people
The answer to this question is the science of forensic study
The inference from the study is that Feather found that schadenfreude was highest when perceived deservedness for the person's misfortune was not low and when the person was a member of a different group as participants.
<h3>What is an inference? </h3>
It should be noted that an inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced based in the information in a study.
In this case, they studied how levels of schadenfreude for a person were affected by perceived deservedness for misfortune and social identity.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
More than $87 billion in federal benefits siphoned from unemployment system, says Labor Department. #accelerationism
