I believe it is <span>b. profit
</span>
Answer:
Increase
Explanation:
Note: <u>The given answer is based upon the assumption that the inventory is sold at fair market value</u>.
In the given case, Hunter company would be termed as an "associate" since the quantum of investment of Gunter in Hunter is more than 20% but less than 50%.
Profits earned by Hunter also belong to the Hunter company in proportion to the percentage of investment held, which would comprise of it's cost of control or added to it's own income as per the case.
In the given case, the difference between fair value and book value reflects profit. Gunter's share in such profits shall be added to it's investment revenue which would increase it's investment revenue.
its all da same because it just a company
Answer:
the private sector should never build a plant, regardless of benefits, because water is a public resource that needs public oversight
Explanation:
The win-win situation refers to the situation in which each one is happy as a result that arrives is best and beneficial for the company
Since in the question, it is mentioned that there is a win-win scenario as there is a larger treatment for the public at a lower cost per gallon
Therefore by this, the private sector should never develop that plant i.e water as it is a resource that is consumed by the public irrespective of their benefits
