Answer:
False
Explanation:
The weighted average contribution margin is calculated by multiplying individual contribution margin with respective size pizzas (i.e number of units sold) then total contribution margin (i.e of both medium and large size) is divided upon total number of units sold, see as follows:
According to Buttercrust Pizza company's sales data medium pizzas sold are twice the number of large pizzas. Now here we have to take an assumption since we aren't given actual sales units. Keeping in mind the sales data we can assume that 100 units of medium pizzas and 50 units of large pizzas are sold during the period.
Contribution margin of medium pizza: (CM× units of medium size pizzas)
Contribution margin of large pizza: (CM× units of large size pizzas)
Contribution margin of medium pizza: $10× 100 = $1000
Contribution margin of large pizza: $22× 50 = $1100
Total contribution (of both pizza sizes) = $2100
Total sales units (of both pizza sizes) = 150
The weighted average contribution margin is calculated as follows:
WACM= $2100÷ 150
WACM= $14
(Disclaimer: the solution of this question has been concluded using self-induced assumptions.)
<span>d. external information search
Becky asked others for their opinions, they aren't marketing controlled necessarily but are certainly marketing influenced. If they are savvy then they read a fair amount on the subject from magazines, websites, etc. which would be classified as marketing-controlled.</span>
Answer:
<em><u>C. only accept unsolicited orders from the customer.</u></em>
________________________________
<em>An </em><em>account</em><em> </em><em>can </em><em>be </em><em>opened</em><em> </em><em>for </em><em>a </em><em>customer</em><em> </em><em>that </em><em>does</em><em> </em><em>not</em><em> </em><em>wish </em><em>to </em><em>give </em><em>suitability</em><em> </em><em>information,</em><em> </em><em>but</em><em> </em><em>only </em><em>unsolicited</em><em> </em><em>trades </em><em>can </em><em>be </em><em>accepted</em><em> </em><em>from </em><em>the </em><em>costumer</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>No </em><em>recommendation</em><em> </em><em>can </em><em>be </em><em>made </em><em>to </em><em>the </em><em>costumer</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>because</em><em> </em><em>the </em><em>a</em><em>gent</em><em> </em><em>has </em><em>no </em><em>basis </em><em>f</em><em>or </em><em>making </em><em>a </em><em>recommendation</em><em>.</em>
Answer:
Gomez Corp. Journal entry
1. 31-Jan
Dr Allowance for doubtful accounts $800
Cr Accounts receivable - C. Green $800
2. 9-Mar
Dr Accounts receivable - C. Green $300
Cr Allowance for doubtful accounts $300
3. 9-Mar
Dr Cash $300
Cr Accounts receivable - C. Green $300
Explanation:
1. On January 1 Gomez Corp was said to use the allowance method to account for uncollectibles which means we have to record the write off as uncollectibles by Debiting Allowance for doubtful accounts with $800 and Credit Accounts receivable - C. Green with the same amount.
2. On March 9, receives a payment of $300 from Green which means we have to record the accounts receivables reinstated by
Debiting Accounts receivable - C. Green with $300 and Crediting Allowance for doubtful accounts with same amount.
3. Since it receives a payment of $300 from Green on March 9 we have to record cash receipt by Debiting Cash with $300 and Crediting Accounts receivable - C. Green with $300.