Question

Darlene is in the process of preparing a speech on global warming. She knowingly includes a source from a fringe group that has been previously discredited, but she thinks the source will really help her drive her argument home. What combination of the ethics pyramid does this case represent?

Answer 1

Answer:

intentional use of bad means

Explanation:

Darlene is making intentional use of bad media as she is using a discredited source to improve her arguments. In discourse we should never use discredited sources, even if that source is positive for the arguments we wish to convey. A speech should always be committed to true, real and up-to-date information. The use of discredited sources undermines the credibility of the speech and weakens the reputation of the speaker.