Answer:
B. It had features that prevented the abuse of government power.
Explanation:
The Federalists refers to a group of people who were keenly interested in the ratification of the federal constitution of the United States of America in 1787. They unanimously believed and agreed that the Articles of Confederation wasn't adequate or sufficient enough to enhance good governance and serve the needs of the United States of America and as such required a new government having greater powers at the national level.
Some of the notable members of the Federalists were Benjamin Franklin, George Washington etc.
The Federalists were a group of people who were well funded, organized and as a result made use of the printed media extensively.
Hence, a key argument advanced by Federalists in arguing for ratification of the U.S. Constitution is that, it had features that prevented the abuse of government power.
<u>The main reason is because credit unions are non-profit organizations</u> desgined to serve and to provide financial assistance to its members and not to generate profit for its shareholders, as it is the case of banks, which are companies.
A credit union is a financial cooperative. Its members provide money to the union (as if they were investing in shares), and these funds enable to give loans, set deposit accounts, and provide other financial products and services to each other through the union. If any income is earned, it will be used to finance projects or services which are benefitial whole community.
Native americans................................
Answer:
d.his ability to build a steam-powered textile mill from memory
Explanation:
Samuel Slater when in the UK, he was named "Slater the Traitor" because he brought British textile technology to America, modifying it for United States use. He was able memorize the designs of textile factory machinery as an apprentice to a pioneer in the British industry before resettling to the United States at the age of 21.
Answer and Explanation:
Consequentialist concerns about euthanasia are concerned with what can happen after euthanasia is seen in a patient. This kind of concern judges that it will not end up killing a patient who would recover, in addition to worrying about what will happen to the patient's family and even to his soul, after euthanasia is performed.
In contrast, non-consequentialist concerns judge what the consequences will be, but rather what can happen to the patient at the time when euthanasia is being applied. In that case, there are concerns about the patient's well-being, whether he will feel pain and whether he may regret it during the process.
