The strength of the it is that it reminds all theorists that they are also are a product of what they study and that they should also never forget that. There is never a final objectifying.
whereas, the disadvantage of it is it seems inevitable almost that engaging in such a deep and complex study will have an different effect on the sociologist’s ability to work with the everyday world in a free and uncomplicated manner.
Explanation:
ps five is the best lolps5 is the best
Answer:
The tax multiplier
Explanation:
The tax multiplier can be regarded as the huge effect of change that occur in taxes on aggregate demand, when there is decrease in taxes then the effect is felt on income as well as consumption due to increase in government spending. Spending multiplier is is bigger compare to tax multiplier. It should be noted that tax multiplier is used to determine the final impact on aggregate demand that occurs as a result of the change in lump-sum taxes.
Whichever one interests you more
Answer:
The author's point of view is reflected in this phrase; "..., in the near future, the United States using the pretext of an allegedly growing threat to the Western Hemisphere, will embark on a long process of increasing the pressure on governments of the Latin American countries to work out additional threats against Cuba."
Explanation:
The author's perspective is seen in his use of words like "pretext," and "allegedly". The author is thus saying that the United States is not straightforward, or completely honest in the claims of a threat to the Western Hemisphere. This phrase also shows that the author believes that the United States was being unnecessarily hard on the Cuban nation by threatening them.
We can sense that the author of the text favors Cuba as against the United States. In order to determine the author's perspective, careful attention ought to be given to certain key words in the text.
