1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexandr1967 [171]
3 years ago
12

Supporters of American expansionism/imperialism believed the US should expand to increase

History
1 answer:
Viktor [21]3 years ago
5 0
C. to stimulate the economy during the great depression.
You might be interested in
What are the reasons the United States entered World War I? Select two correct answers.
natali 33 [55]

Answer:

Economic Interests and German Atrocities in Belgium

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help
irga5000 [103]
A is the best answer if not it’s c
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The key difference between the experience of Ghana's independence and that of Kenya and Algeria is that
frutty [35]

Answer:

Ghana gained independence peacefully, while Kenya and Algeria had to fight violently before gaining independence.

Explanation:

While Kenya became independent in 1963, it was through series of violence from the Mau Mau against the British. Similarly, Algeria had to fight violently against French rule before gaining independence in 1962.

The above is in contrast to Ghana who gained independence peacefully from British rule in 1957.

Hence, The key difference between the experience of Ghana's independence and that of Kenya and Algeria is that "Ghana gained independence peacefully, while Kenya and Algeria had to fight violently before gaining independence."

8 0
3 years ago
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
3 years ago
Name at least three allies of the United States today. How do you think the United States would support these allies in times of
Katena32 [7]
Germany, England, and France. As each nation is a member of NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization), the US has promised to deliver military aid if they have been invaded or attacked by another nation. So, the United States would send extra troops overseas to assist current groups stationed in Europe. In times of peace, it is most typically economically, but sometimes, US presence in times of increasing hostility is enough to cause the aforementioned hostilities to cease. In both times of war and peace, these nations should assist in the same way as the United States does.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was an accomplishment of the Tokugawa shogunate? A. 250 years of peace B. the end of corrupt government for 500 years C. t
    7·2 answers
  • John Locke helped develop the idea of a social contract between citizens and the....
    13·1 answer
  • Unlike a direct democracy, in which all citizens decide laws, a representative democracy involves which of the following? A. law
    13·1 answer
  • How did the samurai bushido influence feudal Japan?
    13·2 answers
  • A tax on retail products based on a set percentage retail cost is called A) sales tax. B) excise tax. C) income tax. D) corporat
    9·2 answers
  • What was the result of increased security measures by the United States government after the September 11th attacks?
    10·1 answer
  • What were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and National Republicans?
    6·1 answer
  • The period from the 9th to the 6th century B.C. is known as the _____________________________ during which the Greek kings were
    11·1 answer
  • Jimmy Carter refused to play the ________ game as President of the United States
    8·1 answer
  • What were the consequences of World War I on the military and industries of Russia?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!