1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mash [69]
3 years ago
6

The anti federalist wanted to?

History
2 answers:
NISA [10]3 years ago
8 0
Ensure the bill of rights was included in the constitution
neonofarm [45]3 years ago
6 0

The answer is C. The anti-federalist wanted to ensure the Bill of Rights was included in the Constitution.  

 

 

EXPLANATION

 

The anti-federalism was the opposition to the new form and frame of the government. The anti-federalism is known for its revolutionary figures such as Samuel Adams, Richard Henry Lee, Patrick Henry, and etc.  

 

One of the revolutionary figures is Elbridge Gerry, who wrote the most well-known anti-federalist tract at that time, titled “Hon. Mr. Gerry’s Objections”. The tract was being printed 46 times, and the writing focused on the lack of a bill of rights in the proposed constitution. The anti-federalism wanted to ensure the Bill of Rights was included in the constitution.

 

The anti-federalism was worried that the strong national government will threaten people’s rights and the president will eventually become a king. There is one line "Half a loaf is better than no bread. If we cannot secure all our rights, let us secure what we can”,  

that’s famous from the anti-federalism.  

 

The Bill of Rights of the US consists of ten amendments to the United States Constitution. This happened because of the objection from the anti-federalists. The Bill of Rights amendments adds to the constitution, for the guarantee that people will still have personal rights and clear limitation of the government’s power against the citizen.

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

The English Bill of Rights: brainly.com/question/11150270

English Bill of Rights influence: brainly.com/question/2974386

KEYWORD: anti-federalism, human rights, bill of rights

Subject: History

Class: College

Subchapter: Bill of Rights

You might be interested in
What is the main way a representative democracy differs from a direct democracy?
Korolek [52]

____________________________________________________

Answer:

Your answer would be A). Citizens elect leaders who vote on the issues in a representative democracy, and citizens vote on the issues in a direct democracy.

____________________________________________________

In a representative democracy, Citizens elect leaders who vote on the issues. In a direct democracy, citizens vote on the issues.

____________________________________________________

Definition:

Representative Democracy:

Citizens vote for representatives to vote for issues in the country. The outcome of the situation is only determined by the votes of the representatives

Direct Democracy:

Citizens are the ones that could vote on a issue or topic. People directly decide on policies from voting.

____________________________________________________

Explanation:

The reason why A). Citizens elect leaders who vote on the issues in a representative democracy, and citizens vote on the issues in a direct democracy is CORRECT is because it is the right definitions for the two democracies. The representative democracy has citizens who vote for a  representative who votes for the people, while the direct democracy is votes that are directly decided by the Citizens. These two democracies are very different, and could range depending on what country it is applied to. Direct democracy is a very hard democracy, especially when the population is very high for a certain country. Countries with high populations usually use a representative democracy.

____________________________________________________

Why the other answer choices are incorrect:

Answer choice B). A representative democracy is modern, and a direct democracy is ancient. is INCORRECT because:

Both democracies were used in the ancient times, and are still used till this day around the world. Both democracies has been used in the Ancient times, and there is no way to call one of the democracies "out dated" since people before also decided if they wanted to use a representative democracy or a direct democracy.

Answer choice C). A representative democracy works better in small groups, and a direct democracy works better in large groups is INCORRECT because:

It is actually the opposite way around. A representative democracy works better with large populations, while a direct democracy works with a smaller population. If it was the opposite way around , the systems wouldn't function the way they were suppose to be. A direct democracy in a high populated country would be a mess since they would have to take every citizens votes. And having representatives in a small populated country wouldn't make any sense either

Answer choice D). Citizens’ desires are ignored in a representative democracy, and citizens’ desires have a better chance of being heard in a direct democracy is INCORRECT because:

Both democracies listen to what the citizens want. In the representative democracy, even though there are representatives who vote, the representatives represent what the people want, and the representatives don't vote from their own decision, they tend to listen to what the people want, and decide if what the citizens want is right or not. Citizens are NOT ignored in a representative democracy. One democracy doesn't have a higher chance of a citizens voice to be heard.

____________________________________________________

-Julie

8 0
3 years ago
Who refused to recieve Johns messengers?
Grace [21]
Jude refuses to reduce johns messengers
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I am going through some tough times and could really use some friends... can someone message me on Instagram..? caidence_eastlin
AnnyKZ [126]
Why can’t you? My Instagram is Jenny.turrubiartes. I like anime and I’ll send you memes if you like
6 0
3 years ago
Was the Bill of Rights part of the original Constitution?
balandron [24]
Many of the rights and liberties Americans cherish—such as freedom of speech, religion, and due process of law—were not enumerated in the original Constitution drafted at the Philadelphia Convention in 1787, but were included in the first ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The most stringent level of the hierarchy of standards is
zzz [600]
<span>B :strict scrutiny
</span>
<span>The most stringent standard of hierarchy of standards used in the USA courts.It is used to weigh the existing government's interest against a constitutional right or principle.These standards are used to test statutes and government action at all levels of government within the United States.</span>

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Identify and explain the major events that led to the American revolution.
    15·1 answer
  • under the article of confederation everyone had to agree, so it was hard to get amendments passed. true or false
    5·1 answer
  • When the aztec asked his god to show him a sign what happened?
    6·2 answers
  • What was the earliest religion practiced in Japan?
    10·2 answers
  • Which of these was NOT a
    6·1 answer
  • How did Christian humanism challenge the renaissance
    6·1 answer
  • What is a cottage industry? Why were they phased out
    12·1 answer
  • (03.03 MC)
    7·2 answers
  • What we’re the first 10 amendments to the constitution called
    5·2 answers
  • 2.09 discussion based assessment is history
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!