My answer is
My answer is
1. Leaders often seize power by illegitimate means
2. All citizens prosper under the government
3.Citizens support the government's official ideology
4. A single leader or a very powerful group rules
5. Leaders refuse to tolerate dissenting views
It will help you :)
im on the same one , its super tricky ill get back with you if i find out
Colonies can provide new goods to the mainland, this bringing in more money
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Burma was annexed as part of the Brithis Raj after a series of Anglo-Birmanian wars, that happened between 1862-1885. A province of the Indian British Raj, it was separated in 1937 and governed by the Burma Office. After the II World War, Britain slowly granted autonomy and lastly independence in 1948. After independence power struggles that included the proclamation of a Socialist Republic in 1972, a coup de etat demading the opening of the country would lead to a military dictatorship that last until 2011, when the military junta was dissolved, and a transition period to a democratic process began. In 2015 elections gave the National League of Democracy victory, and a Parliament was established that elected Htin Kyaw as president, and then designated Aung San Suu Kyi as State Counsellor.
Answer:
<h2>Hi mate PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST IF MY ANSWER IS CORRECT PLEASE </h2>
Explanation:
The three-fifths compromise was an agreement reached by the state delegates at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. Under the compromise, every enslaved American would be counted as three-fifths of a person for taxation and representation purposes.
Origins of the Three-Fifths Compromise
At the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, the founders of the United States were in the process of forming a union. Delegates agreed that the representation each state received in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College would be based on population, but the issue of slavery was a sticking point between the South and the North.
It benefitted Southern states to include enslaved people in their population counts, as that calculation would give them more seats in the House of Representatives and thus more political power. Delegates from Northern states, however, objected on the grounds that enslaved people could not vote, own property, or take advantage of the privileges that White men enjoyed. (None of the lawmakers called for the end of slavery, but some of the representatives did express their discomfort with it. George MAS on of VIRG inia called for anti-slave trade laws, and Gouverneur Morris of New York called slavery “a nefarious institution.”)
Ultimately, the delegates who objected to enslavement as an institution ignored their moral QUAL-ms in favor of unifying the states, thus leading to the creation of the three-fifths compromise.
