<h2>Through t
he concept of prosecutorial immunity.</h2>
Explanation:
In Kalina v. Fletcher (1997), the court ruled that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant. This is occurred when Prosecutor Kalina was sued by Fletcher for making two inaccurate factual statements regarding him during his trial.
Prosecutor Kalina, therefore, seeked the provisions of prosecutorial immunity from the court to gain immunity. However, this was rejected as the court claimed that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant.
This ruling correlate with the concept of prosecutorial immunity becuase she was denied of such immunity. It ruled that her conduct could not be protected through prosecutorial immunity.
I believe it would be the shared experiences dilute traditional cultures. It can’t be the 2nd or 3rd answer because those are positives and it is asking for a negative effect, but I don’t think it is the 4th answer either because I don’t believe that being able to experience the same things would eliminate a culture entirely. Yes it could dilute it because we’d be almost overcoming cultural barriers by connecting through shared experiences throughout the world, but the effects of shared experiences don’t translate to things like genocides or systemic discrimination in an attempt to eliminate a culture.
<span><span>Plateau tribes: Interior Salish, Plateau Penutian</span><span>Great Basin tribes: Uto-Aztecan</span><span>Pacific Northwest Coast: Pacific Coast Athabaskan, Coast Salish</span><span>Southwestern tribes: Uto-Aztecan, Yuman, Southern Athabaskan</span><span>Plains Indians: Siouan, Plains Algonquian, Southern Athabaskan</span><span>Northeastern Woodlands tribes: Iroquoian, Central Algonquian, Eastern Algonquian</span><span>Southeastern tribes: Muskogean, Siouan, Catawban, <span>Iroquoian</span></span></span>
Answer:
A. It wanted a strong national government.
Explanation:
The Whig Party, wanted to form a strong federal government. They did not have any intentions of closing national parks or lowering taxes on imports.