1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
coldgirl [10]
3 years ago
14

Washington and Monroe believed the United States should not become involved in European affairs.

History
1 answer:
Gnoma [55]3 years ago
7 0

I think that it is still marginally conceivable to follow the principles of the Monroe Doctrine. Nowadays, Europe has not been bothering the United States, except for the guidance of their very abundant views. <span>Times have changed, they are no longer isolated from Europe because of a supervisory king. They need to entomb the past and become associates with any possible supporters, because they may need them someday. This also includes not meddling with their governments and countries unless it is completely essential.  </span>

You might be interested in
Why was the Great Compromise so great?
Sauron [17]

Answer:

Provided a dual system of congressional representation.

Explanation:

Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth). In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population.

7 0
2 years ago
Why did people from the North South and West feel differently about going to war with Britain?
Volgvan
There was no '' west '' but people from the south considered it a northern problem. Because in 1812 in American '' west '' only reached as far as the Mississippi River
6 0
3 years ago
predict if you think there will ever be any new amendments to the Bill of Rights. Predict what you think it will be about and te
Sergio [31]
I don't think there will be. it requires a super majority to amend the constitution and super majorties rarely happen.
6 0
3 years ago
A 19th-century english social darwinist would say that his or her nations power was proof of
marta [7]
He would claim that it was proof of superiority. Social Darwinism is an idea that people or countries who succeed in life and who become rich did so because they could adapt to the environment and that those who are poor are inferior to them because they couldn't. In country leading, the idea is that the countries that became wealthy were superior and thus easily became rich while poor countries are inferior in their opinions.
3 0
2 years ago
Ideas spread to influence public opionion
liberstina [14]
True. This is a true statement! We have many people who have shaped our lives and the world because of their ideas! :) Hope I helped. :)
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Drag and drop the documents in order they were adopted or ratified from earliest to latest
    11·1 answer
  • Continuous improvement is an operations concept developed in
    12·1 answer
  • Where did tulips originate?<br><br> The Netherlands<br> Egypt<br> India<br> China
    12·2 answers
  • What caused Russia to exit World War I in 1917?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the bigger problem for the army of northern Virginia:supply shortages or manpower shortages :why?
    12·1 answer
  • What happens to trees from one life zone to the next?
    8·1 answer
  • Which best describes forces that shaped pre-colonial africa
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following correctly completes line I.__________ in the outline above?
    8·2 answers
  • Who wants to make a change today​
    15·2 answers
  • What was the issues of the 1896 presidential election?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!