Answer:
Jones may decide that the equity method would not be appropriate to account for the investment when Jones Company does not have significant influences over the management/operation of Sandridge Company.
Although an investors holding from 25% of investee is very much likely to have significant influences on the investee, this may not be true all over the times. For Jones, to prove that it does not have significant influences over Sandridge, there may be some following evidences:
+ Jones and Sandridge sign an agreement that Jones surrenders significant rights as a shareholder;
+ There is/are investor(s)/group(s) of investors who has more voting right than Jones and whose visionary/mission for Sandridge is opposite to Jones's.
+ Sandridge tries to reject Jones' influences on its management by seeking lawsuit or by successfully prevent representatives from Jones on its Board of Directors.
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
statement of cash flows can be regarded as financial statement which gives analysis of how cash as well as cash equivalent is affected by any changes in balance sheet accounts.
The indirect method of statement of cash flows begins with loss or the net income as well as the substraction of values from non cash revenue which result in case flow as a result of operating activities.
You have to be a moderator. That's all I know.
Answer: It is called affective choice
Explanation:
Affective decision-making (ADM) is a debatable and predictive theory of individual choice under risk and uncertainty. It generalizes expected utility theory by positing the existence of two cognitive processes – the “rational” and the “emotional".
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Because there are plenty of suppliers for some goods, the food truck owner is more powerful in this case than the suppliers. Here the power of suppliers is low
For the other goods with only a single supplier. the supplier has more powerful than the taco seller. here the power of supplier is high. If the supplier increases price, the taco seller would most likely have an inelastic demand and would be at the mercy of the supplier
thus, the power of suppliers is relatively high for some items and relatively low for others.
