The correct answer is <span>Early leaders were unable to agree on regional and economic differences.
They differed in the opinion on who should have more power, the federation or the states, and on which system should the economy be based. They were called federalists and anti-federalists.</span>
Martin Lurther King Jr is by far one of my favourite historical figures. What he did is very inspirational, and teaches many of us (not only the minority) that we can still make a difference, even in times of difficulty.
At rechieving his Nobel Peace Prize, Martin Lurther King Jr, delivered a speech that touched many hearts. It was about the fight to freedom.
"...win the racial injustice...I accept...we move with determination...establish a rain of freedom...our children crying out of brotherhood...trying to secure the right to vote...who were brutalized...unrelenting struggle...this movement is [to achieve]...that non-violence is the answer to the political and moral questions on our time...without resorting to violence and oppression...have demonstrated that non-violence...is a POWERFUL moral force..."\
Answer: D
I hope this helps :)
Answer:
- Lane-Poole, “For the first time in their history, the Mughals beheld a
rigid Muslim in their emperor—a Muslim as sternly repressible of himself as of his people around him, a king who was prepared to stake his throne for sake of his faith.
- He must have been fully conscious of the dangerous path he was pursuing, and well aware against every Hindu sentiment. Yet he chose this course, and adhered to this with unbending resolve through close on fifty years of unchallenged sovereignty.”
-
Dr. S.R. Sharma, writing about the acts of religious intolerance of Aurangzeb has observed, “These were not the acts of a righteous ruler of constructive statesman, but the outbursts of blind fanaticism, unworthy of the great genius that Aurangzeb undoubtedly possessed in all other aspects.”
Aims of Aurangzeb’s religious policy:
- It is generally accepted that Aurangzeb was a fanatic Sunni Mussalman. His chief aim was to
convert Dar-ul-harb (India: the country of Kafirs or infidels) to Dar-ul-Islam (country of Islam).
- He was intolerant towards other faiths, especially Hindus. He was also against Shia Muslims.
Aurangzeb’s religious policy had two aspects i.e:
(i) To promote the tenets of Islam and to ensure that the people led their lives accordingly.
(ii) To adopt anti-Hindu measures.
Anti-Hindu measures:
Following were the anti-Hindu measures adopted by Aurangzeb:
- Demolishing temples and breaking idols
- Imposition of Jaziya
- Discriminatory toll far
- Removal of the Hindus from Government jobs
- Restrictions on Hindu educational institutions
- Conversion through different means
- Social restrictions
