1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kondor19780726 [428]
3 years ago
5

What are some potential benefits and potential costs of total war, and do the potential benefits ever outweigh the costs?

History
1 answer:
OlgaM077 [116]3 years ago
5 0

There are huge loss of life and property in a total cost.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The concept of " cost war" means that there are no limits in that war. Anyone can be attacked in that war and there is no restriction on the type of weapon also that is to be used in that war.

So the benefits of such a war can not be any but there can be only cost of the war because it can only lead to the harm of the life and property of the people who are involved in that total war. Benefits never out weigh the costs.

You might be interested in
Fugitives risked being captured in northern states.
AnnyKZ [126]

Answer: 2nd option/ B

Fugitives risked being captured in northern states.

Explanation: I just got it right

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which European countries had territory that was no longer within Russian boundaries because of the Brest-Litovsk treaty ?
Yuliya22 [10]

Answer:

The Settlement of Brest-Litovsk was a different ceasefire endorsed on Walk 3, 1918, between the new Trotsky ite administration of Russia and the Focal Forces. It finished Russia's interest in World War I.

6 0
3 years ago
Which president's policies showed the greatest support for the idea of Manifest Destiny?
Mashutka [201]
The answer is Andrew Jackson.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the capitals of each choctaw creek cherokee chickasaw seminole
kompoz [17]
What are u even saying
5 0
3 years ago
Cuales fueron las causas y efectos de las guerras de peloponesio​
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

Las causas principales fueron que Esparta temía el creciente poder e influencia del Imperio ateniense. Los efectos fueron La riqueza, el prestigio, las políticas y el poder de Atenas causaron resentimiento entre otras ciudades-estado. Una plaga que mató a muchos atenienses ayudó a Esparta a derrotar a Atenas. La Guerra del Peloponeso debilitó a todas las ciudades-estado griegas durante 50 años.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these experiences would help you to better understand democracy?
    11·1 answer
  • Help me please solve this
    14·2 answers
  • Describe and discuss the Western Front of the war. Why did Germany want to win the first battles quickly?
    8·1 answer
  • The Greek historian Thucydides differed from Herodotus in that the former a. was unconcerned with spiritual forces as a factor i
    7·1 answer
  • Why is trump a bad president?
    7·1 answer
  • Early Rome's religion was primarily______.
    6·2 answers
  • Question 14 of 25
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following accurately depicts president roosevelt’s ""supreme court packing plan"":
    10·1 answer
  • Who is Sun-Ya-teen. ​
    15·1 answer
  • What is the ultimate goal of an interest group?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!