Our inequality is 3(x-1) - 4x ≥-3. We can solve this like we solve for x in a regular equation. If I multiply 3(x-1), our new inequality is 3x -3 - 4x ≥ -3. If we add 3 to both sides and subtract 4x from 3x we have -x ≥ 0. But we want the value of x to be positive, not negative. So we multiply both sides by -1 and change the sign from greater than to less than. We get x<span> ≤ </span>0.
The triangle will still be similar to the original triangle.
Those transformations altered the position and scale of the triangle, but the angle measures are still the same.
I think that the sum will always be a rational number
let's prove that
<span>any rational number can be represented as a/b where a and b are integers and b≠0
</span>and an integer is the counting numbers plus their negatives and 0
so like -4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4....
<span>so, 2 rational numbers can be represented as
</span>a/b and c/d (where a,b,c,d are all integers and b≠0 and d≠0)
their sum is
a/b+c/d=
ad/bd+bc/bd=
(ad+bc)/bd
1. the numerator and denominator will be integers
2. that the denominator does not equal 0
alright
1.
we started with that they are all integers
ab+bc=?
if we multiply any 2 integers, we get an integer
<span>like 3*4=12 or -3*4=-12 or -3*-4=12, etc.
</span>even 0*4=0, that's an integer
the sum of any 2 integers is an integer
like 4+3=7, 3+(-4)=-1, 3+0=3, etc.
so we have established that the numerator is an integer
now the denominator
that is just a product of 2 integers so it is an integer
<span>2. we originally defined that b≠0 and d≠0 so we're good
</span>therefore, the sum of any 2 rational numbers will always be a rational number <span>is the correct answer.</span>
The answer is D (42.39 cubic inches)
Answer z=2
See picture attached for the math
