Answer:
Marci's inference about the cause of the girl's behavior is an example of <u>explanatory attribution</u>.
Explanation:
This type of inference is called explanatory attribution, because it somehow explains the causes, and it also gives reasons why some facts are so. Explaining agressiveness through past experience of the girl, is an example of inferring plausible causes about certain conduts.
Answer:
Americans with religious conviction should balance it with obedience to the government by adherence to the legislation that are made from day to day.
Explanation:
Depending on the situation, the government allows freedom and at some poses some restrictions to the religious activities in a bid to safeguard the citizens and enhance peace.
religion does not occupy a special place in the American state thus it is mandatory for the citizen with different religious conviction and belief to stick to what the government requires.
some laws are legal but again they might be unethical. in this situation, or even scenario, the citizens with religious convictions should simply abide by the law and fully fulfill their obligation which is obeying the laws.
B. <span>The president of the United States cannot decree public policy; Russian presidents have the power to order the government to carry out a policy.
</span>
Answer-
False
Explanation-
They wouldn’t allow them to run together
Answer: True
Explanation: Work/family life conflict has been a issue of social debate which usually occurs within families when they find it difficult to find the balance between work and family. It is a socio-economic issue which is likely to persist into the future. With issues such as ; More women in the paid workforce, more dual-income families, more single working parents and so in not likely to recede anytime soon.
