Answer:
Classical decomposition requires the study of the space the art takes place in, the color composition if applicable, the lines and flow of the work, the technique used, and the emotion and intellectual response it evokes. The space in which the art takes place could be the phsyical setting, the division of space in the work itself (common in paintings) and how it interacts with the space (negative vs. positive space.) The color composition is important in how the colors chosen relate to the work (or the lack there of). The lines and flow of the work tend to pertain more to visual works but anyone that has evaluated the artwork in automotive design know full well the importance of lines in the work. The technique is important especially in phsyical artwork such as sculpture and relief painting. This is also crucial in multimedia work and abstract sculpture. The last part, largely subjective, is what the work solicits from the viewer. Art without emotion could be argued ... isn't art. Andy Worhol explored this idea with pop art (cambell soup can anyone?) on what is the nature of art. Art is either everywhere (in your spoon, fork, stapler, etc.) or some rare thing (a painting by Raphel verus the macroni happy face the 4 year old did) and if it is a rare thing then what does the art have to convey? What elevates art from engineering then? This last part is solely the responsibility of the critic rather then the artist. An artist always sees their art as art, but what prompts the view to consider it art and what steps does the work take to make a believer out of the viewer.
Explanation:
did it help ?
Answer: A.
singular; idiosyncrasy
Explanation: It is not B. because it is not an innumerable talent and there is not a surplus of this talent. It is not C. because it is not insular or an idiom. It is not D. because people are not disconcerted or shocked to the point where they do not know how to act and this talent is not plural. This leaves you with A. singular;idiosyncrasy because it is a talent that not many people have and it is an unusual thing about him.
Hope this helps! :)
PROMPT:
I would rather jump out of a plane. I would want to do this because you can feel the fresh air in your face and under your arms, also because it would be something adventurous and fun todo! I think if I jumped out of an airplane i would be scared at first and might need a few encouraging words, but i would do it because it would be something fun and new todo ecspecially when you have nothing else to do and need that fresh air. I also think if i jumped out of an aiplane and like it, I would do it more and more times, it would bring me out of my comfort zone and make me feel free and brave, i dont know for sure if i would do it for a living but i would do it for fun! Something else daring I would want to do and it would also bring me out of my comfort zone is holding a snake, i never have before but if i did i would be scared but if i actually did it I would feel brave and more confidnet in myself! Also if i could do something else daring it would probably be driving a motorcycle, I think if i tried to drive one it would also give me fresh air and ALOT of confience, I think about alot of daring things i could do when I grow up but these are really the top three because they would give me more confidence and courage to do alot more things!
Answer:
People relying on religious leaders to explain the workings of the universe
Explanation:
