<span>The most basic difference lies in their view of human nature. For Hobbes, humans are eager of power and under the state of nature we tend to kill each other. For this reason, we need a social contract (in order to survive). For Locke, the state of nature is not as pessimistic as Hobbes. We can colaborate, but the problem is in property. Locke wrote something like when we have issues of who is the owner of what (specially under scarcity) we need the social contract protecting our work materialized as property.
I recommend you Hobbes' Leviathan and Locke's Second Treatise of Government. It is everything there and quite clearer than I have tried to explain it.</span>
Can you please input the options for the question? Then I could help you.
They were the federalists and the antifederalists
the federalists favored it
and the antifederalists did not
Answer:
That they should not claim colonies in the Americas
Explanation:
On 2 December 1823, President James Monroe of the United States of America while addressing the Congress articulated that European powers should acknowledge Western hemisphere a the United States sphere of interest. This is called as Monroe Doctrine and had great influence in the United States foreign policies in the years to come. The interference in the puppet government of Mexico, crises in Cuba were seen as a result of this doctrine.
B.) the system of checks and balances
