Yes, do you have an attachment of it?
what are you trying to say here exactly
Answer:I’d say A
Explanation:
In response to widespread sentiment that to survive the United States needed a stronger federal government, a convention met in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787 and on September 17 adopted the Constitution of the United States. Aside from Article VI, which stated that "no religious Test shall ever be required as Qualification" for federal office holders, the Constitution said little about religion. Its reserve troubled two groups of Americans--those who wanted the new instrument of government to give faith a larger role and those who feared that it would do so. This latter group, worried that the Constitution did not prohibit the kind of state-supported religion that had flourished in some colonies, exerted pressure on the members of the First Federal Congress. In September 1789 the Congress adopted the First Amendment to the Constitution, which, when ratified by the required number of states in December 1791, forbade Congress to make any law "respecting an establishment of religion."The first two Presidents of the United States were patrons of religion--George Washington was an Episcopal vestryman, and John Adams described himself as "a church going animal." Both offered strong rhetorical support for religion. In his Farewell Address of September 1796, Washington called religion, as the source of morality, "a necessary spring of popular government," while Adams claimed that statesmen "may plan and speculate for Liberty, but it is Religion and Morality alone, which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand." Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the third and fourth Presidents, are generally considered less hospitable to religion than their predecessors, but evidence presented in this section shows that, while in office, both offered religion powerful symbolic support.
Jews of the first century had the greatest and most widespread expectation of a <u>Davidic Messiah</u>; Jews anticipate a David-lineage king who will rule Israel with righteousness and justice in the end times. And most likely the one they yearned for, who had the strength to drive away their adversaries.
As a traditional messianic title referring to the Messiah's lineage from David, "Son of David" refers to the greatest king of Israel. Many Jews in ancient Israel did not accept Jesus as the promised Messiah.
However, since the messianic figures ranged from king to priest to prophet, messianic expectations varied from one group to another. Some came to believe that the Messiah was a supernatural being.
Figure out how Jews and Christians are different in regards to messianic thought: brainly.com/question/1471002
#SPJ4
