Answer:
a. interviews were expensive to conduct
Explanation:
The disadvantage of in depth interview contained in the scenario is that face to face or in-depth interviews are expensive to conduct.
The rationale behind this conclusion is as presented in the scenario that ''In order for executives to agree to the interviews the company provides a large cash incentive.''
The fact that in-depth interview could be paid for, in order to guarantee its occurrence; is a practical display of the fact that in-depth interview or Face-to-Face method, is very expensive.
Such considerations include understanding of:
the reasons for and objectives of sampling.
the relationship between accuracy and precision.
the reliability of estimates with varying sample size.
the determination of safe sample sizes for surveys.
the variability of data.
This is not the reason why not support ethical relativism; Ethical
relativism holds that there is a right and wrong, even though we do not agree
about what is right and wrong and If people disagree about some moral matter,
their disagreement will always be due to their having different moral values.
Answer:
a giant corporation composed of many smaller corporations.
Explanation:
This option is not 100% right, but the other options were completely wrong. A conglomerate is a corporation that operates in totally different and unrelated industries. For example, a conglomerate can operate in the energy sector, financial services, education services, cruise lines, and agriculture. No two industries are even related to one another, and that is what operates a conglomerate from a normal corporation. E.g. Samsung is a conglomerate because it operates an electronics business, manufactures cars, builds ships, operates funeral homes, etc.
Answer:
$101,293
Explanation:
$100,000 face amount + $7,000 interest to maturity ($100,000 x 7%) = maturity value less the discount for the time remaining to maturity of $5,707 ($107,000 x 8% x 8/12) = $101,293