During the Gilded age, society experienced a period where there are so many social issues exist around them, but it was clouded/masked by silver lining (massive economic growth for society but it only enjoyed by a select view followed by massive exploitation toward a certain group)
During the reconstruction Our society realized this defect and started to made several changes
The Federalists wanted the wealthy and educated to lead the nation, focused on businesses and trading, and had a loose Constitution interpretation. The Anti-feds wanted the people of the nation to lead, focused more on agriculture, and wanted a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Federalists wanted Hamilton's plan for financial crisis to work because it would help their businesses. The opposing side were against it because they would be the ones who had to pay for the high tariffs.
Answer:
irst supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1]
Explanation:
The United States involvement in the Mexican Revolution was varied and seemingly contradictory, first supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1] For both economic and political reasons, the U.S. government generally supported those who occupied the seats of power, whether they held that power legitimately or not. A clear exception was the French Intervention in Mexico, when the U.S. supported the beleaguered liberal government of Benito Juárez at the time of the American Civil War (1861-1865). Prior to Woodrow Wilson's inauguration on March 4, 1913, the U.S. Government focused on just warning the Mexican military that decisive action from the U.S. military would take place if lives and property of U.S. nationals living in the country were endangered.[2] President William Howard Taft sent more troops to the US-Mexico border but did not allow them to intervene in the conflict,[3][4] a move which Congress opposed.[4] Twice during the Revolution, the U.S. sent troops into Mexico.
True. Steamboats were much more efficient
