Answer:
First option (A)
Explanation:
After the war, Britain has some great territorial gains. I hope this helps you, and have a great day. :)
The <span>primary purpose that a citation serves in a work of history is to show where exactly the information is coming from, so that the reading can either confirm the validity of a statement, or continue further research independently. </span><span />
In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories.
Answer:
In 1978, the ACLU took a controversial stand for free speech by defending a neo-Nazi group that wanted to march through the Chicago suburb of Skokie , where many Holocaust survivors lived. The notoriety of the case caused some ACLU members to resign, but to many others the case has come to represent the ACLU's unwavering commitment to principle. In fact, many of the laws the ACLU cited to defend the group's right to free speech and assembly were the same laws it had invoked during the Civil Rights era, when Southern cities tried to shut down civil rights marches with similar claims about the violence and disruption the protests would cause. Although the ACLU prevailed in its free speech arguments, the neo-Nazi group never marched through Skokie, instead agreeing to stage a rally at Federal Plaza in downtown Chicago.
Explanation:
This is a very difficult argument. Civilians must never be victims of war and
the army must do all that it can to avoid inflicting casualties on
civilians. The difficulty here is that
terrorists often hide within civilian surroundings and use civilians as
shields. What government needs is not
only better technology but better intelligence. Still, as hard as it sounds, so
long as civilians are in the line of fire, there will be victims.
