Answer:
Spain saw Britain as a rival and wanted to expand its own territory in North America.
Explanation:
The helped counter balance Britain's naval power. The Continental Navy had roughly 20 ships and Britain's Navy had roughly 500. The Spanish ships helped make it hard for the British Navy to blockade the American coast. They also send advisers to the colonists to help train them and help them improve.
The Answer Is Ferns I Think
Answer:
The answer would be oil paints
Famine and plague spread death across Europe. -Merchants moved between Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, and Asia, carrying both goods and new
<h3>What is
Merchants?</h3>
A trader in goods made by other people is known as a merchant, particularly one who conducts business internationally. Anyone who engages in commerce or trade is referred to historically as a merchant. As long as trade, industry, and commerce have existed, there have been merchants. In 16th-century Europe, two distinct terms for merchants emerged: meerseniers referred to local traders (such as bakers and grocers), and koopman referred to merchants who operated on a global scale, importing and exporting goods over great distances while providing added-value services like credit and finance.
In different historical eras and among various societies, the standing of the merchant has changed. When referring to a businessperson or an activity in the modern era, the term "merchant" has been used sporadically.
To learn more about Merchants from the given link:
brainly.com/question/21160687
#SPJ4
Answer:
Legally, representatives of the Electoral College have the right to vote as they like and for whom they want, ignoring the results of popular vote in their states. State governments, for their part, have the power to impose monetary fines and, in some states, to revoke such votes. The general situation was clarified by the Supreme Court in 1954 in the ruling in Ray v. Blair. It was clarified that the states and parties to which the electors belong have the right to demand from them a preliminary “pledge to vote” and provide for actions in case of violation of such an oath, but they cannot prosecute electors in the framework of criminal procedure of the Code for breaking such an oath.
Now, the Supreme Court places emphasis on the protection of the popular will, which gives voters the task of voting for the required candidates. If this were not the case and the voters chose with absolute freedom which candidate to vote for, the popular will would be severely impaired and the voters would be practically the only voters who would define the destiny of the federal government.
