Answer:
Ideas such as eugenics and cloning.
Explanation:
This are controversial because would be tried in humans and would open up not only many moral and ethical debates but also in it's aplications, which cases, at which people, how, etc.
Answer:
Eukaryotic group is defined by the presence of a nucleus
Explanation:
Eukaryotes are living organisms characterized by the presence of a nucleus
Answer:
Social referencing.
Explanation:
While acquiring new knowledge of environmental events, infants are able to regulate their attitudes towards people and objects in compliance with the affective display of their caregivers. Social referencing refers to the observation of facial expression by children to understand the situation, persons and the environment around them.
Answer:
Organizations are responding to social media complaints using all of the methods indicated. This provides more tools to avoid any type of repercussions.
Explanation:
- Adding non-disparagement clauses in consumer contracts. When someone downloads an app, a user must accept an agreement, sometimes so extense and complicated, that the user will just click <em>Accept</em>. T<u>hese agreements or contracts could include protections</u> so costumers don't speak negatively about a company.
- Increasing the legal staff in the organization. In the case of legal actions, the best protection is to have several attorneys<em> preparing documentation in advance</em> and <u>receiving notification of all potential complaints from community managers</u>.
- Zeroing in one statement that is not true and ignoring the rest. The community manager can take action reducing importance to any complaint created by a consumer, and disregard all related comments. This will make appear the <em>complaint as something unfounded </em>and will lose importance to the eyes of other consumers.
- Deleting unfriendly posts. The most aggressive form of control, and the one that could affect the corporative image the most. Since customers are denouncing something that feels is affecting them directly, the deletion of this complain could be seen as censorship, and tyrannic. Even though the company <u>could set rules</u> to avoid discrimination and violence on their social networks, a comment sent to get help about a situation that affects a customer directly is not correct from a <em>marketing or public relations stand.</em>
