Answer:
Sociology 101: Intro to Sociology has been evaluated and recommended for 3 semester hours and may be transferred to over 2,000 colleges and universities. If you're looking for an easy and self-paced way in which you can review engaging lessons and get expert instruction to help you get started on your degree, then this resource is for you.
Explanation:
Answer:
The best answer seems to be letter B. An individual often perceives the same concept or idea differently from another.
Explanation:
According to the quote by Van Morrison, a famous person's perception of himself is different than other people's perception of him. That simply means that different people, different individuals, can perceive the same idea in a contrasting manner to others. It may very well be that Van Morrison himself didn't wake up thinking he was famous, but that other famous people do. It all depends on their perception. Another example still related to fame is the way some people perceive it as good while others as bad. Those who see fame as a bad thing treasure their privacy and personal life. They value solitude and quietness. Those who see it as good desire the paparazzi, the flashes, the questions, even the intrusions. From their perception, all of that means they are important, loved, admired.
Answer: d. staffing U.S. embassies and consulates worldwide.
Explanation:
The United States Department of State is the country's first line in foreign affairs and relations. They engage in actions geared at protecting and advancing American interests around the world as well as actions that contribute to the general well being of the world, all of which are in line with the President's foreign policy.
As the first line of communication with foreign entities, the Department of State maintains and staffs over 250 U.S. embassies and consulates worldwide which communicate with not only countries, but with international organisations as well.
Answer:
Social responsibility is an ethical framework and suggests that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large.[citation needed] Social responsibility is a duty every individual has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems. A trade-off may exist between economic development, in the material sense, and the welfare of the society and environment,[1] though this has been challenged by many reports over the past decade.[when?][2][3] Social responsibility means sustaining the equilibrium between the two. It pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose any action impacts the environment.[4] This responsibility can be passive, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or active, by performing activities that directly advance social goals. Social responsibility must be intergenerational since the actions of one generation have consequences on those following.[5]
Businesses can use ethical decision making to secure their businesses by making decisions that allow for government agencies to minimize their involvement with the corporation.[6] For instance if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions on dangerous pollutants and even goes an extra step to get involved in the community and address those concerns that the public might have; they would be less likely to have the EPA investigate them for environmental concerns.[7] "A significant element of current thinking about privacy, however, stresses "self-regulation" rather than market or government mechanisms for protecting personal information".[8] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of the shareholder, and that if there is not an outcry there often will be limited regulation.[9]
Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, or "greenwashing";[10] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations though there is no systematic evidence to support these criticisms. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly negative correlation with improved shareholder returns.[11]
Explanation:
plzz mark me as brainlist
