Answer:
D. Each region established its own ''iron curtain'' to protect its interests
Explanation:
After the World War II, Western and Eastern Europe quickly diverged because of their politics. While the West was promoting democracy and market economy, the East was promoting communism and command economy. The strategic interests were intermingled, which led to lot of tensions, so there was a sharp division with artificial political boundary that was separating the two. As both sides were trying to spread their ideologies, but were also afraid of the influence of their opponent, they set ''iron curtains'' resulting in isolation between the two on pretty much every level.
Answer:
Actor/observer bias
Explanation:
In psychology, the actor/observer bias refers to the tendency to attribute our own actions to external causes while attributing other people's behaviors to internal causes.
When the results of a situation are negative, if the negative outcome happened to the person, the person will likely attribute the outcome to external circumstances. But when it comes to other people, the person will attribute the outcome to the other person behaviors, habits or actions.
In this example, Jeremiah falls and thinks the ice is brutal. <u>He is attributing the fall to an external circumstance (the ice)</u>. But then, when his friend Ed falls on the same spot, he says his friend is really clumsy, <u>attributing the fall to an inner characteristic of his friend</u>. Therefore, this would be an example of actor/observer bias.
The economic consequence which doesn't relate to obesity in this case would be D - the cost of services for chemotherapy. The amount of money that chemotherapy costs is largely unrelated to obesity levels either of the one who's giving it or the one who's receiving it.
This is the best I got: The best way to prove that slavery was in fact an inefficient market because the assumptions of Fogel and Engerman are weakly based and in some cases rather short-sighted.
The answer is "Referent Power".
Referent power alludes to the capacity of a guide or leader
to impact a supporter in light of the devotee's faithfulness, regard, kinship,
adoration, fondness, or a want to gain approval.
John French and Bertram Raven were two
individuals who presented five kinds of power which are:
Coercive Power.
Reward Power.
Legitimate Power.
Referent Power.
Expert Power.
