The answer on edg. is:
C.) <em>The introduction of Islam into West Africa</em> :)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not include the article so we can read it. You neither attach the link of the article, the name of it, or the author. Without that information, we do not know what you are talking about.
However, trying to help you, we can comment on the following.
Some authors considered Nat Turner as a dangerous man. Some others, as a criminal. Most of them, as a trouble maker.
Ono of those particular articles was published before Turner had been sentenced. So this article tried to influence public opinion, portraying Turner as a criminal, causing so much fury in the community. As was expected, white people demanded harsh punishment for him.
But now we know that the article had a particular agenda. Nat Turner was not an assassin. He was just fighting for his convictions. Turner had led the rebellion of Virginia slaves in August 1831.
From May 25 to September 17, 1787, 55 delegates from 12 states convened in Philadelphia for the Constitutional Convention. Rhode Island was the only state that refused to send representatives to the convention, which assumed as its primary task the revision or replacement of the Articles of Confederation.
Though the Articles of Confederation had provided the framework for governance since the declaration of the American Revolution against Britain, many of the fledgling nation’s political leaders agreed that the creation of a stronger central government was essential to the development of the power and potential of the United States. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government lacked the power of taxation, had no authority to regulate commerce, and was impotent to resolve conflicts arising between states.
The colonies got their independence from Great Britain. The slaves who were promised freedom for fighting in the war (on both sides) I would assume we're granted freedom.
