1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anestetic [448]
3 years ago
6

What factors influenced the development of the southern colonies

History
1 answer:
stepladder [879]3 years ago
5 0
<span>The major factors that influenced the development of the colonies was the production of major crops like cotton. The production and export of cotton to the northern colonies as well as Europe drove the southern economy for decades, even up to the Civil War. In addition this economic development was made possible by the abundance of slave labor that lowered costs and led to high levels of production. </span>
You might be interested in
Unlike the period of the Roman Empire in the sixth century Arabia was more
AURORKA [14]
Religious..... they prayed up to 5 times a day and still do.. Also Rome was very sophisticated in it's military...
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The executive of the nation is called the
Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

the President

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
A result of Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor was
Burka [1]

The correct option is (c), thousands of Americans died, and the US declared war.

Pearl Harbour was one of the most important strategic points for the U.S. Armed Forces and using this, they could maintain their valuable control over the forces supply routes throughout the Pacific Ocean. The Allied supply routes in the Atlantic had been jeopardized by enemy warships and submarine boats, and it was extremely crucial for the Americans to keep their Pacific routes open so that the Allied troops stationed could be kept open. However, Japan’s motive to achieve mastery over the Pacific Ocean supply routes and unite all southeast Asian nations under its leadership. Attacking an extensive American Naval base in Pearl Harbour was a strategic move, as it would somehow weaken the control of U.S. forces over the Pacific, the Axis Powers would be able to open vital new supply chains through the Pacific, and the U.S. military supremacy would be diminished, thus boosting the Axis morale.

Further Explanation:

The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour changed the course of the Second World War, as it made the United States an active participant. Till now, the United States played a major but secondary role, by keeping the Allied troops supplied with arms, ammunition, warplanes, warships, and naval expertise, and keeping vital supply chains open throughout the Pacific. The destruction of Pearl Harbour was massive, albeit highly unplanned. The Japanese air force failed to assess the importance of the onshore supply facilities, and thus did not target them, targeting only aircraft and battleships stationed at the Island. The importance of aircraft carriers could not be envisaged, and the Japanese made a crucial mistake in not targeting the Pacific fleet, which was instrumental in keeping the Pacific routes open. The vital repair facilities were left intact, allowing the United States to quickly replenish its lost resources, and mount a full-scale offensive against Japan. Thus, the declaration of war by the U.S. on Japan was a huge turning point for the Allied Forces.

Learn more:

1. Under new imperialism, Europe did not need large numbers of people to control territories because of

<u>brainly.com/question/187221 </u>

2. Which state ratified the constitution after congress agreed to amend the constitution to include the bill of rights?

<u>brainly.com/question/9951862 </u>

Answer Details:

Grade: Graduation

Chapter: The U.S. Entry to the Second World War

Subject: History

Keywords:

Pearl Harbour, Military invasion, supply routes, arms and ammunition, mastery over the Pacific, onshore facilities, direct conflict.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which financial policy would a wealthy, northern industrialist have been MOST LIKELY to support in the late 1800s?
Irina18 [472]
A wealthy, northern industrialist would have most probably supported the <span>Alien Contract Labor Law</span> during the late 1800s. This is because the north were in-charge with manufacturing they had high demand for cheap labor. The act was passed to ensure that there were enough laborers for the industries in America.
5 0
3 years ago
When religious leaders such as James thornwell and Albert Barnes wrote about slavery what did they base their views on
polet [3.4K]
They wrote about slavery from the standpoint of the Bible (Barnes opposed slavery, while Thornwell, a Southerner, supported it).
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What dose the name Buddhism mean
    15·2 answers
  • What causes imperialism to start war?
    11·1 answer
  • Rachel Carson a 1962 Silent Spring was a groundbreaking work regarding what topic?
    14·1 answer
  • The housing and urban development act of 1965 and the fair housing act of 1968 were both aimed at
    14·2 answers
  • How was the settlement of Oklahoma Territory different from that of other Western territories?
    9·1 answer
  • At the beginning of World War I, what policy did Wilson Support?
    11·2 answers
  • Why did the pioneers typically have to walk
    12·2 answers
  • What is Zinn attempting to say about historians? Do you agree or disagree? Support your answer as best as you can.
    13·1 answer
  • Name one reason for poor race relations in the Deep South during the<br> 1930s.
    11·1 answer
  • Evaluate the reasoning Douglass uses in the
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!