I don’t think so because when you are observing you refer to facts but when you infer you have to hypothesize what the outcome will be
Answer:
<em><u>I</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>HOPE</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>I</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>HELP</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>YOU</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>A</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>LOT</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
D
Unlike carbon-based fuels like coal, natural gas, and petroleum, nuclear energy does not release greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Therefore it does not contribute to global warming.
Explanation:
Nonetheless, nuclear energy is not widely adopted for energy because of its safety concerns. Fission energy is harmful to the environment because of nuclear waste it generates. How this nuclear waste is stored is very important because leakage can lead to contamination of an environs with lethal radioactive elements.
Learn More:
For more on nuclear energy check out these;
brainly.com/question/9935260
brainly.com/question/1013815
#LearnWithBrainly
3<span>. </span>Populations<span> and </span>samples<span> ... Although a statistician should clearly </span>define<span> the </span>population<span> he or she is dealing with, they may not be able to enumerate it exactly. For instance, in ordinary ... For taking a</span>sample<span> from a long </span>list<span> a compromise between strict theory and practicalities is known as a systematic random </span>sample<span>.</span>
The military will change lots like right now there replacing the Humvee with the mrap and the m1 abrams is being replace to there also making liquid armor and robots to oh ye and that armor stuff that has a exo skeleton to help carry the armor and supplies<span />
