1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RSB [31]
3 years ago
10

Please help

Mathematics
1 answer:
AVprozaik [17]3 years ago
6 0
I personally think it's C I hope it's right if not I'm Sorry
You might be interested in
Marianne wanted to know students' opinion on the new schedule at school. She survey's the first
Sonja [21]

I think it is a Convience Sampling.

6 0
3 years ago
Help! algebra 2, quadratic formula! timed!
hichkok12 [17]
The answer to the question

5 0
3 years ago
Maria ran 194 miles in 4 hours.What is the unit rate
astraxan [27]
The unit rate would be 48.5 miles per hour because you would just divide 194 and 4 and get the ratio of 48.5:1
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Find the value of y . <br> Please help !
Leokris [45]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  (b)  √55

Step-by-step explanation:

The right triangles in this geometry are all similar, so the ratio of long side to short side is the same:

  y/5 = 11/y

  y² = 55 . . . . . . multiply by 5y

  y = √55 . . . . . take the square root

__

And x=4√5 by looking at ratios of short side to hypotenuse.

8 0
3 years ago
Someone please help Me! Solve each system of equation. I need help I don’t understand and this is due tomorrow. I’ll make brainl
mestny [16]

Answer:

  (a, b, c) = (-2, -3, 5)

Step-by-step explanation:

The idea is to find values of a, b, and c that satisfy all three equations. Any of the methods you learned for systems of 2 equations in 2 variables will work with 3 equations in 3 variables. Often, folks find the "elimination" method to be about the easiest to do by hand.

Here, we notice that the coefficients in general are not nice multiples of each other. However, the coefficient of "a" in the second equation is 1, so we can use that to eliminate "a" from the other equations.

__

Add 3 times the second equation to the first.

  3(a +3b -4c) +(-3a -4b +2c) = 3(-31) +(28)

  3a +9b -12c -3a -4b +2c = -93 +28 . . . . eliminate parentheses

  5b -10c = -65 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .collect terms

  b - 2c = -13 . . . . . . . divide by 5 (because we can) "4th equation"

Subtract 2 times the second equation from the third.

  (2a +3c) -2(a +3b -4c) = (11) -2(-31)

  2a +3c -2a -6b +8c = 11 +62

  -6b +11c = 73 . . . . . . "5th equation"

Now, we have two equations in b and c that we can solve in any of the ways we know for 2-variable equations. Once again, it looks convenient to use the first of these (4th equation) to eliminate the b variable. (That is why we made its coefficient be 1 instead of leaving it as 5.)

Add 6 times the 4th equation to the 5th equation:

  6(b -2c) + (-6b +11c) = 6(-13) +(73)

  6b -12c -6b +11c = -78 +73 . . . . . . . eliminate parentheses

  -c = -5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . collect terms

  c = 5 . . . . . multiply by -1

We can now work backwards to find the other variable values. Substituting into the 4th equation, we have ...

  b -2(5) = -13 . . . .substitute for c

  b = -3 . . . . . . . . . add 10

And the values for b and c can be substituted into the 2nd equation.

  a + 3(-3) -4(5) = -31

  a -9 -20 = -31 . . . . . eliminate parentheses

  a = -2 . . . . . . . . . . . . add 29

__

The solution to this set of equations is (a, b, c) = (-2, -3, 5).

_____

<em>Comment on steps</em>

At each stage, we made choices calculated to simplify the process. By using equations that had a variable coefficient of 1, we avoided messy fractions or multiplying by more numbers than necessary when we used the elimination process. That is, the procedure is guided by the idea of <em>elimination</em>, but the specific steps are <em>ad hoc</em>. Using <em>these same specific steps</em> on different equations will likely be useless.

_____

<em>Alternate solution methods</em>

The coefficients of these equations can be put into the form called an "augmented matrix" as follows:

\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}-3&-4&2&28\\1&3&-4&-31\\2&0&3&11\end{array}\right]

Many graphing and/or scientific calculators are able to solve equations written in this form. The function used is the one that puts this matrix into "reduced row-echelon form". The result will look like ...

\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}1&0&0&-2\\0&1&0&-3\\0&0&1&5\end{array}\right]

where the rightmost column is the solution for the variables in the same order they appear in the equations. The vertical line in the body of the matrix may or may not be present in a calculator view. The square matrix to the left of the vertical bar is an identity matrix (1 in each diagonal element) when there is exactly one solution.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do I solve <br><img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%20%5Csin%28%20a%20%29%20%20%3D%20.8325" id="TexFormula1" title=" \sin(
    11·1 answer
  • Graph the line with slope -3 and -1
    14·1 answer
  • Please help, file is attached
    13·1 answer
  • △HFM∼△PST
    7·1 answer
  • I need help PLEASE!!!!!!!!
    10·1 answer
  • What are the minimum and maximum values of t for which |t + 3| ≤ 2
    15·1 answer
  • I need help please and thank you
    12·1 answer
  • How can you write the equation for a linear function if you know only two ordered pairs for the function?
    15·1 answer
  • Which shape has 2 parallel sides /i ready question
    13·2 answers
  • Determine the measure of LUXW in the diagram.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!