1. He agreed to abdicate and retire in favor of the next in line for the throne
2. My sister always treated me like I was a blight on the family name.
3. He was blithe about the risks to his health.
4. He led an ephemeral electronic existence.
5. Their fervid attacks on image worship led
to their expulsion.
6. I refuse to use the fetid public bathroom
that looks and smells as though it has not been cleaned in months.
7. A small Colombian flag was neatly tucked in his open mouth.
8. He had much taste and love for music, and considerable gifts as an orator of a florid type.
9. She picked the flower up and poked it over her left ear.
10. People who are nice and gullible are always taken advantage of.
11. irascible doctor who is offended by his presence beats him to within an inch of his life.
12. He feared the ignominy of being exposed as a spy.
13. She kept on lamenting and crying, continued the woman.
14. He shows a monastic dedication to his job.
15. The shares were sold for well below their nominal value.
16. Because she is a chef, she notices every nuance of flavor in the meal.
17. The beginnings of his doctrine of cellular pathology date from the earliest period in his career.
18. It is a defence against sedition and socialism.
19. This argument is rather specious than sound.
20. They were once looked down upon as the tawdry poor relations of the fashion industry.
Answer:
the art of speaking or writing effectively
Explanation:
According to the merriam-webster dictionary, the definition of the word <em>rhetoric </em>is the <em>art of speaking or writing effectively</em>
Answer: False, While Narratives are more commonly fictional, they can also on occasion be true.
Answer:
A moral dilemma is shown here
Explanation:
Starting with the last word, <em>perfidy </em>is a deliberate breach of faith or trust; in the context of war - we can assume that this the case because of the word <em>peace</em><em> loving country</em> - perfidy can actually lead to warcrimes, like waving a white flag and then kill the enemy.
So the moral dilemma is that a country is very likely to be uncomfortable with a pact, the other side probably being a bit of a war loving country, but diplomatic relations deny the possibility of breaking the pact.
The part <em>not wishing to take the initiative of breaking the pact </em>is, if I´m not mistaken, a subordinate adjective clause that refers to the noun <em>country</em>.
So this country, not wishing etc., could not resort to perfidy either. Because that would be even worse, considering the fact that it is a peace loving country.
The evidence that supports the student’s reason is B. three Shakespearean plays are studied in ninth grade, including the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet.
<h3>What is an evidence?</h3>
Evidence simply means the claim or stance of an author in a literary work. It's simply the main argument expressed.
In this case, the evidence that supports the student’s reason is that three Shakespearean plays are studied in ninth grade, including the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. In this case, since the reason is that the students are introduced to Shakespeare’s writing, the claim is supported.
Learn more about evidence on:
brainly.com/question/1256677
#SPJ4
