The control center of a cell is the

استدل من الحديث الشريف علي : حرص الرسول ( صلي الله عليه وسلم ) علي تقويم سلوك من..4

gulaghasi [49]

Answer:

sorry i only speak english

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Tula/waiting panudyo

Elza [17]

Answer:

dinkopo gets ano po yun?? pa explain po

6 0

2 years ago

Answer the image in brief

expeople1 [14]

Answer:

Answer is option C

Explanation:

If you like my answer than please mark me brainliest thanks

5 0

2 years ago

3. the first amendment to the constitution prevents the government from interfering with the free exercise of religion. the litu

Dimas [21]

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

The 1st Amendment states, quote:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...

Now, this may be seen as the government not being able to interfere with banning the practice of human sacrifice. However, based on Reynolds v. U.S. (1878), The Supreme Court ruled that religious duty is not a defense against criminal indictment.

On top of that, human sacrifice in the modern world is deemed as a murder, as the victim is typically not consenting. If, however, they are, it may still be deemed as manslaughter. Under Section 18 of the US Code 1111, Murder is defined as, quote the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought... or premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect death of any human being other than him who is killed. (Section a, Section 18, U.S. Code 1111).

Within the religious liberties that are protected by federal law, it is stated under Executive Order 13798 (82 FR 21675 - Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty). The most important part to look at from this order is section 2, which states that The free exercise of religion includes the right to act or abstain from action in accordance from one's religious beliefs, and in section 10, which states that the given act prohibits the federal government from substantially burdening any aspect of religious observance or practice, unless imposition of that burden on a particular religious adherent satisfies strict scrutiny. (Emphasis added, Federal Law Protections for Religious Liberty, RFRA 1993). In this case, the scrutiny is satisfied as the religious practice breaks US Code 1111 Section 18, as stated above. Therefore, the government can be allowed to interfere with this particular practice.

Laws & rights in use in this case, as well as court decisions:

- 1st Amendment, U.S. Constitution

- Reynolds v. U.S. (1878) - Chief Justice Morrison Waite.

- Section 18, US Code 1111

- Executive Order 13798

- Federal Law Protections for Religious Liberty, Religious Freedom Restoration act, 1993.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Learn more about Religious Freedom, here:

brainly.com/question/4773712 - Freedom of religious worship is guaranteed by...

3 0

1 year ago

Questions 1 Clasificar Assign the appropriate category to each word. arroz con pollo café con leche cereales espárragos huevos r

marin [14]

Answer & Explanation:

Questions

1 Clasificar Assign the appropriate category to each word.

arroz con pollo - la cena

café con leche - el desayuno

cereales - el desayuno

espárragos - la cena

huevos - el desayuno

refresco - el almuerzo

sándwich de jamón - el almuerzo

entremeses - la cena

2 Seleccionar Select the item that does not belong.

1. arvejas champiñones frijoles entremeses 

2. pavo camarones salmón atún

3. jugo aceite vino té

4. naranja maíz manzana pera

5. chuleta de cerdo melocotón camarero zanahoria

6. lechuga queso yogur leche

3 ¿Lógico o ilógico? Indicate whether each statement is lógico or ilógico.

1. Tengo sed; voy a beber un jugo de pimienta. lógico ilógico (To drink pepper juice won't help you)

2. Normalmente, las salchichas son de carne, de pollo o de cerdo. lógico ilógico (sausage is made from different types of meat)

3. Comemos la ensalada con mantequilla. lógico ilógico (There's no butter salad)

4. Generalmente, el dueño de un restaurante no sirve los platos. lógico ilógico (The owner of a restaurant hires waiters)

5. El limón es una verdura. lógico ilógico (Lemon is a fruit)

6. Si quieres merendar, puedes comer una fruta. lógico ilógico (You can have fruit whenever you want)

4 Completar Fill in the blanks with the correct form of the words from the list. Four words will not be used.

Word Bank reference:

frijoles langosta menú pollo probar recomendar saber sabroso/a

Question 1 with 1 blank

—Y tu amiga Cristina, ¿come langosta ?

—No, a ella no le gustan nada los mariscos.

Question 2 with 2 blanks

—No conozco este restaurante. ¿Usted me puede recomendar un plato principal?

—Sí. Debe probar el bistec con cebolla. Es muy sabroso .

Question 3 with 1 blank

—¿Te gusta la sopa?

—Mmm... sí. Sabe mucho a ajo.

3 0

2 years ago