All categories

3 years ago

2(x-1)+4x=3(x-1)+7 I need to solve to see if it solves, has no solution, or infinitely many solutions.

Mathematics

1 answer:

gladu [14]3 years ago

7 0

It should have 1 solution, x = 2. :)

You might be interested in

Please Hurry ...Which expression is equivalent to

swat32

Answer:

$\huge\boxed{\sf \frac{160rs^5}{t^6}}$

Step-by-step explanation:

$\sf 5r^6t^4 ( \frac{4r^3s^tt^4}{2r^4st^6} ) ^5$

Using rule of exponents $\sf a^m/a^n = a^{m-n}$

$\sf 5r^6t^4 ( 2 r^{3-4} s^{2-1}t^{4-6})^5\\5r^6t^4(2r^{-1}st^{-2})^5\\5r^6t^4 * 32 r^{-5}s^5t^{-10}$

Using rule of exponents $\sf a^m*a^n = a^{m+n}$

$\sf 160 r^{6-5}s^5t^{4-10}$

$\sf 160 rs^5 t^{-6}$

To equalize the negative sign, we'll move t to the denominator

$\sf \frac{160rs^5}{t^6}$

8 0

3 years ago

Timed test please help

insens350 [35]

Last option: − ∞ < y < 5

8 0

3 years ago

Help with question 4 please

musickatia [10]

Answer:

dont know

Step-by-step explanation:

sorry

6 0

3 years ago

shi x, miao w, and tchetgen tchetgen ej. (2020). multiply robust causal inference with double negative control adjustment for ca

fomenos

Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.

What is unmeasured cofounding?

By definition, an unmeasured confounder is a variable that is connected to both the exposed and the result and could explain the apparent observed link.
The validity of interpretation in observational studies is threatened by unmeasured confounding. The use of negative control group to reduce unmeasured confounding has grown in acceptance and popularity in recent years.

Although they've been utilised mostly for bias detection, negative controls have a long history in laboratory sciences and epidemiology of ruling out non-causal causes. A pair of negative control exposure and outcome variables can be utilised to non-parametrically determine the average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data that is vulnerable to uncontrolled confounding, according to a recent study by Miao and colleagues.

Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.

Learn more about unmeasured confounding here:

brainly.com/question/10863424

#SPJ4

5 0

2 years ago

The table shows conversions of pounds to ounces. A 2-column table with 4 rows. Column 1 is labeled Pounds with entries 2, 4, 6,

Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

its 96 hope this helps!

Step-by-step explanation:

it's 96 because 128-(128/8)=96

5 0

3 years ago