The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there is no further information about the case of study, we can say that the question possible refers to the case where the name of the company is just "The Client." The name of the document is "Leading Innovation Change - The Kotter Way."
This case refers to the challenges faced by an organization when it is time to innovate. Many members want to innovate but the culture of the company or the lack of proper leadership from managers often hinders the innovation efforts of the company.
So some of the elements of Kotter's Eight Stages of Leading Change that were included in the case were the following.
Create Urgency. The creation of new products of the company was limited and was not enough to compete in the future. A sense of urgency was needed to implement innovation.
Form a Powerful coalition. The company had to be very selective about the kinds of products that could help it to successfully compete in the future. The company had to use the best it had to establish priorities.
Create a vision for change. It was critical for the company to establish a new vision to get the results it needed. A renovation of the processes to face new necessities was imperative. Change has to be part of every member's mind.
Communicate the vision. This new vision had to be shared through the entire company. The members had to understand the importance of the innovative practices and each and every one of them had to be part of this new mentality.
The Black Market is a series of dealers who can get you a product that has been repealed from stores, such as 2006 yellow Tide, which cleaned the products too good, forcing the company to take it off the market because they wanted to continue to sell products that they claim better than the last. The Black Market is illegal and if currently under high investigation by governments all over the world. So, if the Black Market practice itself is illegal and all actions taken while in the Black Market are as well, I think you can finalize your answer. Hope this helped!
Answer:
I'm thinking C
Explanation:
This seems really written in a smart aleck way. It could be D also though.
Answer:
The overview of the statement is summarized below.
Explanation:
- The capital structure seems to be the ratio of net required by investors toward about there capital expenditure. Investment return capital spending seems to be the return rate required for expenditure.
- Returns required by financial institutions are much worse than the amount of capital, even before investors necessitate a reasonable level of profitability.
The thing which usually happens during tight money periods, generally is:
- short-term rates are higher than long-term rates.
<h3>What is a Tight Money Period?</h3>
This refers to an economic policy in which there is the need for control of inflation in the economy by the financial institution in a country.
With this in mind, we can see that when this happens in the tight money periods, there is usually short term rates which are higher than long term rates because there is a need to control the economy which is rising too quickly.
Read more about inflation here:
brainly.com/question/1082634
