Answer:
The correct answer is: Emotional contagion.
Explanation:
The emotional state of an individual can be affected by the exposure to emotional expressions of others around which means that the emotional state can be transferred from one person to another even in online interactions through a process called emotional contagion.
Emotional contagion implies an individual connecting its emotions to others' moods which is likely to be reflected in both parties' behavior.
Answer:
$37.80
Explanation:
Particulars Amount Calculations
Direct materials $7.00
Handling $2.80 ($3,500/5,000*4 parts)
Assembling $9.60 ($12,000/5,000*4 parts)
Packaging <u>$18.40 </u> ($5,750/1,250*4 parts)
Total manufacturing cost per chair <u>$37.80</u>
Answer:
Perfection records in it's books an Investment in Associate of $486,000
Explanation:
Hi, your question has missing information, i tried to look for the full question online but I could not find it.
However, I have prepared below explanation to the problem.
When a firm has investments into another firm of less than 50% voting rights in stake but greater than 20% we say that firm has significant influent in the investee. The firm is said to have an Investment in an Associate.
Investments in Associates are always recorded using the Equity Method of Accounting.
<u>Entries for Investment in Associate are :</u>
Debit :Investment in Associate ($1,944,000 × 25%) $486,000
Credit : Share of profits of associate $486,000
Conclusion :
Perfection records in it's books an Investment in Associate of $486,000
Answer:
The firm's cost of preferred stock is 9.10%
Explanation:
The cost of preferred stock with the flotation of 5% would be the dividend payable by the preferred stock divided by the adjusted current market price(adjusted for flotation cost)
The dividend per year is $8
The adjusted price of the stock=$92.50*(1-f)
where f is the flotation cost in percentage terms i.e 5%
adjusted price of the stock is =$92.50*(1-5%)=$ 87.88
Cost of preferred stock=$8/$87.88*100 = 9.10%
Answer:
a good decision requires that we recognize both viewpoints
Explanation:
Based on this information it can be said that an economist would most likely state that a good decision requires that we recognize both viewpoints. That is because every decision will affect everyone, but some individuals will be affected positively while others will be affected negatively. Therefore trying to recognize the viewpoint of both sides will allow for decisions that are as fair as possible to both sides.
