Answer:C) social behaviours as a result of genetic factors and natural selection.
Explanation:
Evolutionary psychology is a biological approach that aims to examine human behaviour. It works in close association with cognitive psychologist who explain our behavior as driven by internal psychological mechanism but it only differs by stating that these internal mechanisms are due to adaptations which has resulted from natural selection. These are the adaptations that had helped our ancestors to adjust and reproduce.
A human being becomes socialized from community because the outside world is nothing but communication.
Answer:
C. High-tech.
Explanation:
High-tech can be defined as the use of the latest or most advanced technology. High-tech is simply a short word for high technology and it comprises of a cutting edge or frontier technology by virtue of the use of the latest or most advanced technology available to users.
This ultimately implies that, a high technology (High-tech) typically involves the process of using complex computer systems, electronics or tools that are considered to be the latest or most advanced in the technology industry.
<em>Some examples of high-tech products are smart televisions, capsule endoscopy, smartphones, electric cars, etc. </em>
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Although the leaders of two enemy nations admit to a buildup of their own military forces, each sees the other country's actions as unreasonable and motivated by evil intentions. This situation best illustrates:
the mere exposure effect.
the just-world phenomenon.
mirror-image perceptions.
deindividuation.
social facilitation.
None of the listed answers are correct
Answer:
This situation best illustrates mirror-image perceptions.
Explanation:
The term mirror-image perception refers to the human tendency of viewing others as the enemy, as evil, especially in a situation of conflict. It is called mirror-image because both people or sides involved in the conflict see themselves as good, and the other as the villain. That is precisely the case described in the passage. Both leaders do not see a problem concerning their own buildup of their military forces - they "know" they are doing it for good reasons. But both of them also think that the other leader doing it is a sign of evil intentions on his part.
