The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options provided, we can say that Kant meant with that quote was "we cannot imagine a world where everyone makes deceitful promises, because the practice of promising presupposes trust and none would trust anyone in a world where everyone makes deceitful promises."
Emmanuel Kant, one of the most important philosophers of our times, considered that people should be very honest to have a good life and never compromise their word in vain because that would generate that other people would never trust this individual. For Kant, people had moral values and they should never try to cheat or manipulate other people. Respect was one of the most appreciated values for him.
Toward the beginning of American colonization, both American and Britain profited from each other, be that as it may, expanded monetary strains and new government suggestions prompted American want for autonomy. In pilgrim America, the gap amongst creolization and anglicization belief systems was exacerbated as British collected harsh acts and expenses on the provinces.
Answer
Yes
Explanation:
According to the Central Limit Theorem, the sample size, being n larger than 30, is representative of the Standford students´ use of the drug, in this case, being ecstasy. Another reason why the procedure works is the random sampling, where the assistants made sure that the only characteristic that mattered was being a student; gender, major being pursued, age, etc. were not of relevance.
On my computer the map won't load but i'm guessing A. people cannot farm in Africa.
(hope this helps :C
Answer: Any damages recovered by Darius's suit will normally go to ENERGY RENEWABLE.
Explanation: This damages will typically go to energy renewable because this is an example of a derivative suit. A Derivative suit is defined as a case where two or more people disagree and a shareholder on behalf of a corporation takes the case to a court for resolution. Shareholder derivative suits permit a shareholder to initiate a suit when management has failed to do so.
