It should be noted that a judicial philosophy in which a justice is more likely to let stand the decisions of other government branches is known as judicial activism.
On the other hand, a judicial philosophy in which a justice is more likely to overturn decisions or rule actions by the other branches unconstitutional, especially in an attempt to broaden individual rights and liberties, is called judicial restraint.
Judicial restraint simply means the power of judicial review to set aside government acts. On the other hand, judicial restraint simply means the refusal to strike down such acts.
Learn more about judicial review on:
brainly.com/question/4937540
Answer:
- A comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
- A correspondence or partial similarity.
- A thing which is comparable to something else in significant respects.
Credits go to: Google Dictionary
The correct answer is C) a Straw Man.
<em>The type of fallacy the second council member is making is Straw Man.
</em>
A strawman argument is an argument that is fallacious and distorts an opposing argument with the intention of attacking it more easily. But what really happens is that the strawman argument is not responding or attacking the original argument, but a distorted idea of the original argument,
In this case, the type of fallacy the second council member is making is a strawman, when he says that “making drinking water only available to rich people is a terrible idea.”
Vikings transports us to the brutal and mysterious world of Ragnar Lothbrok, a Viking warrior and farmer who yearns to explore - and raid - the distant shores across the ocean.
The best answer in regards to the specific question appears to be A: Many small towns boomed as people came to drill wells.
