Considering the given figure, the conjecture with the rephrased statement of proof to show the diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other is: In parallelogram EFGH show EK is congruent to KG and F.K is congruent to KH
<h3>How to determine the correct rephrase of the proof about parallelogram diagonals</h3>
The diagonals refer to the lines running between the two opposite ends of the parallelogram
Bisecting means sharing into two equal parts
congruent means a copy that is equal in dimension hence can be used in place of the other image
The diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other means that the diagonals cut each other to form two equal parts such that each part is congruent to each other.
Learn more on diagonals of a parallelogram
brainly.com/question/17920093
#SPJ1
Hello!
<h2>Answer:</h2>
Carla will pay $300.30 for the gold ring.
<h2>Explanation:</h2>
Sales tax is added on to the total cost of the item. We need to figure out how much tax is on the ring.
To do that, we must calculate 10% (or 0.10) of $273.00.
273 × 0.10 = 27.3
Now, add the tax to the cost of the ring.
273 + 27.3 = 300.3
Answer:
The feasible region in the attached figure
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
x ----> the number of shirts
y ----> the number of pants
we know that
The cost of the shirts (number of shirts multiplied by the cost of one shirt) plus the cost of the pants (number of pants multiplied by the cost of one pant) must be less than or equal to $80
so
The inequality that represent this problem is
using a graphing tool
The feasible region is the triangular shaded area
see the attached figure
The population standard deviation, σ = 1.68, the sample standard deviation, s = 1.95, the sample mean =7.23, and the sample size, n = 39.The test statistics is given by
T=(n - 1) (s / σ)²
= (39 - 1) (1.95 / 1.68)²
= 38 (1.35)= 51.196
All the points if they lay on top of eachother
if they arent on top of eachother, they can intersect at 2 points
