Correct answer: on the basis of the age of sitting judges.
Context/explanation:
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) was eager to implement his New Deal programs as an antidote to the Great Depression. However, the US Supreme Court had already ruled that some provisions of the New Deal were unconstitutional, because they took too much power into the hands of the federal government, especially the executive branch of the federal government. So, riding the momentum of his landslide reelection victory in 1936, in February of 1937, FDR proposed a plan to expand the Supreme Court to as many as 15 judges. The plan offered to provide full pay to justices over age 70 who would retire. If the older justices didn't retire, assistant justices (with full voting rights) would be appointed to sit with those existing justices. This was a way FDR hoped to give the court a liberal majority that would side with his programs.
As it turned out, before FDR's proposal came up for a vote in Congress, two of the sitting justices came over to his side of the argument, and the Supreme Court narrowly approved as constitutional both the Social Security Act and the National Labor Relations Act. So his plan (which failed in the US Senate) became unnecessary to his purposes.
Roosevelt's "court-packing" scheme was unpopular. It was seen as an attempt to take away the independence of the judicial branch of government.
Answer:
A somatic symptom disorder marked by a preoccupation with a fear or belief of having a serious disease in the face of either no or minor medical symptoms and excessive behaviors related to this belief is D. illness anxiety disorder.
Explanation:
Illness anxiety disorder is probably better known as hypochondriasis. People who have this disorder display excessive fear or worry about being sick. Often, they do not have any physical symptoms. They can also misinterpret normal body sensations or minor symptoms, attributing their cause to a grave illness. People with this disorder refuse to believe they are healthy, even though tests do not reveal anything confirming their supposed illness.
A short story about a person lying to protect a friend is an example of vignette methods.
Vignettes are short stories about a hypothetical person that have traditionally been used in quantitative or qualitative research on sensitive topics in the developed world. Vignette studies are emerging in the developing world, but there has been no critical examination of their utility in such settings.
Because of their descriptive nature, vignettes are important because they can illuminate significant information, create depth of character, or provide insight into past events or circumstances. This contributes to a more complete picture of the larger story. Vignettes are used to provide detail in all stories.
Learn more about Vignette here:
brainly.com/question/10483816
#SPJ4
Answer:
The explanatory variable in the Yale study is <u>which medication a subject was given.</u>
<u />
Explanation:
The response variable in a study is the focus of the question of that study. In this particular case, what the study aims to know is whether a subject was able to stay off cocaine. The explanatory variable is the one that may or may not influence the response variable. In this case, what might influence the subjects is the medication given to him/her.
It has changed people who used to be nice people into bad
