Eyewitness testimony, diary entries, interviews, and surveys are examples of <u>primary</u> sources.
Eyewitness testimony is the testimony of a bystander or victim in court, describing what that character noticed at some point in the research of a case. preferably, the reminiscence of this event is precise. however, this isn't always usually the case.
Eyewitness Testimony is a legal time period. It refers to money owed for activities witnessed by means of people. as an instance, you'll be asked to explain a lawsuit approximately a robbery or vehicle twist of fate that a person noticed. This consists of figuring out perpetrators, crime scene information, and so on.
 Learn more about Eyewitness  here: brainly.com/question/894354
#SPJ4
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
For each of the following investments, we need to use the following formula:
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
(a) $5,500 in 10 years at 9% compounded semiannually.
i= 0.09/2= 0.045
n= 10*2= 20
FV= 5,500*1.045^20= $13,264.43
(b) $12,500 in 15 years at 8% compounded quarterly.
i= 0.08/4= 0.02
n= 15*4= 60
FV= 12,500*(1.02^60)= $41,012.88
(c) $13,600 in seven years at 6% compounded monthly.
i= 0.06/12= 0.005
n= 7*12= 84
FV= 13,600*(1.005^84)= $20,677.03 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
a) In compliance with the IFRS
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that The financial statement of kansas ltd would be authorized by the management and auditors as on Feb 15 fpr issuance. On Feb 20 it settled as a plaintiff a 5 million euro lawsuit. Now the CFO of the company have make the second decision regarding the financial statement presentation in which he decides not to record this settlement so here is in compliance with the IFRS
Therefore the option A is correct
 
        
             
        
        
        
Bobby is the person on the team who receives the lowest customer service ratings. This problem can be solved by using a simple logic of a sentence sequence. In this sequence, Bobby has never outperformed anyone and Hector has outperformed everybody in the statement. Therefore, we can conclude that Bobby has the lowest rating of all.
        
             
        
        
        
If this is a true/false question, the answer is FALSE.
It is consumers' responsibility to report fraud when it occurs.