After each legislative election the party<span> that wins the most representatives is designated the "</span>majority<span>" in each house, and the other </span>party<span> is called the "</span>minority<span>. ... Next, when each house convenes in its first session, </span>Congressional<span> leaders, such as the Speaker of the House and the </span>Majority<span> Leader in the</span>Senate<span>, are selected ...
</span>
Answer:
the state’s interest in regulating the matter.
Explanation:
The law in the state of Arizona affects the interstate commercial activities around trucking and the court would seek avenues to make sure that the unfavorable impacts of the law on interstate commerce gets balanced off with the interest of the state in regulating the matter. The court will not try to balance off that burden on interstate against non-commercial activities in the area or the authority of the courts to ascertain if a law is constitutional or not.
All other options stated above are incorrect except option C
The decreased pressure on the food supply reduces starvation and misery from the population.
Who is Thomas Malthus?
The first person to make a public prediction regarding the upper limit of the human population and the relationship between population and wellbeing was the English philosopher Thomas Malthus (1766–1834). An Essay on the Principle of Population, written by Malthus in 1798, clarified his forecasts and altered the perspectives of many readers.
According to Thomas Malthus, the expansion of the human population is proportional to the amount already existent and demonstrates exponential growth. In proportion to the growing total size, exponential expansion causes the pace of rise to accelerate.
Thomas Malthus believed that the world will enter a downward cycle as a result of the expanding population and the scarcity of food. He concluded that unchecked population growth would result in resource depletion, more pollution, overpopulation, and higher unemployment.
Know more about population here:
brainly.com/question/11745354
#SPJ4
Your question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
As a hungry dog runs ever closer toward a bowl of food, the less likely it is to stop running until it reaches the food. This best illustrates that the dog's running behavior is most strongly affected by ________ reinforcers.
a) secondary
b) immediate
c) partial
d) negative
Answer:
This best illustrates that the dog's running behavior is most strongly affected by <u>b) immediate</u> reinforcers.
Explanation:
We can reach the conclusion above by elimination. A secondary reinforcement is one associated with a primary one. Suppose you're teaching the dog to sit. When the dog sits, you give it a treat (primary reinforcer) and then say, "Good job!" (secondary reinforcer). That is not the case here.
A partial reinforcer is one given every now and then, that is, not every time the desired behavior happens. That is also not the case.
A negative reinforcer is the removal of something that was already present. Imagine you have made your son do the dishes after he misbehaved. When he behaves properly, you tell him he doesn't have to do the dishes anymore. You didn't give him a reward; you simply removed the punishment. That is negative reinforcement.
<u>Therefore, we are left with immediate reinforcers. The dog has already learned that the bowl contains food, that food will be given to him immediately if he reaches the bowl. That is why he doesn't stop nor doesn't get distracted. He is hungry and wants to end his hunger immediately.</u>
