Answer:
D
Explanation:
because they did not know what to believe in
Answer:
exchanging information or sending messages back and forth
Explanation:
Van der Donck was born in approximately 1618, in the town of Breda in the southern Netherlands. His father was Cornelis Gijsbrechtszoon van der Donck and his mother was Agatha Van Bergen.[5] His family was well connected on his mother's side, as her father, Adriaen van Bergen, was remembered as a hero for having helped free Breda from Spanish forces during the course of the Eighty Years' War.[6]
In 1638, van der Donck entered the University of Leiden as a law student. Leiden had rapidly become an intellectual center due to Dutch religious freedom and the lack of censorship. At Leiden, he obtained his Doctor of both laws, that is, both civil and canon law.[6] Despite a booming Dutch economy, van der Donck decided to go to the New World. To this end, he approached the patroon Kiliaen van Rensselaer, securing a post as schout, a combination of sheriff and prosecutor, for his large, semi-independent estate, Rensselaerswijck, located near modern Albany.[7]
Answer:
a. dishabituation
Explanation:
In psychology, the term dishabituation refers to when a person shows a new interest in a new stimulus that occurs when a change in the stimulation is really intense so the person pays attention to the environment again. In other words, t<u>he person first became habituated to the stimulus because it was shown to him/her too many times but then a sudden change makes the person show interest again.</u>
In this example, a baby has given<u> 100 presentations of a high-pitched tone and he is no longer responding to it </u>(he became habituated to the stimulus and lost interest on it). However, <u>a low-pitched tone is presented</u> (which is totally different from the high-pitched one) and the behavior of stopping sucking is back. Therefore, this is an example of dishabituation.
