<u>Answer:
</u>
The type of factor that probably plays a bigger role in determining whether a person will try a drug in the first place, as opposed to determining which of those who try it will become dependent is the social factor.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The behavior that a normal person exhibits is often controlled by various factors. One of those factors is the societal pressure that the person inevitably experiences.
- The choices that are made by an individual are often influenced by the thought pertaining to the acceptance that the people show towards the choice in general.
- Hence, the social factor plays a considerable role in determining whether a person will try a drug at all or not.
Answer:
9 or 10 cases.
Explanation:
The men who arrive to pump Mildred's stomach are indifferent because they have naturalized this procedure since, in that society, there is a high consumption of drugs that help to control the population. Besides, people use them as an incorrect way to deal with problems, so this is something that happens every day.
As the consumption of pills is normal and shows how sick that society owing to the permanent control and surveillance that is damaging people because it doesn't give then freedom or the ability to think. The men take it as something that happens every day, but they do not seem phased by it because they don't have the tools to realize what is happening.
There is no right or wrong, which distinguishes Christian ethics from strictly scientific ethics for a number of reasons.
<h3>What distinctions exist between Christian and scientific ethics?</h3>
The sciences have been and continue to be supported by Christianity. Many clergy have been involved in the sciences, and it has been widely used in the construction of schools, universities, and hospitals. Christian ethics is not a theory, model, framework, or intellectual creation of either humans or the divine. Christian ethics are fundamentally distinct from those of all other world religions. Each ethical philosophy offers concepts (propositions) regarding what is right and wrong. These concepts are either human conceptions or they are said to be divine. Scientific and religious explanations can in reality conflict when religious explanations explicitly make use of or presuppose empirical truths and when these claims are known to be true. Religion deals with the spiritual and supernatural, whereas science studies the natural world; as a result, the two can complement one another. There need not be a tension between religious belief and the scientific view of evolution, according to statements made by several religious organizations.
To know more about Christian ethics and scientific ethics, click here:
brainly.com/question/21842202
#SPJ4
An effective way to manage the situation is by having to set
the difference in the status aside because by doing this, both parties are
equal and are free to talk regarding the issue without having to be limited
just because the other is likely to have a higher in status and by doing so,
the conflict may be resolved easily.
Answer: In Explanation
Explanation:
I'm gonna label them
1.Inventors:Created New machines
2.U.S state and taxpayers: Decided which projects to build
3.Taxpayers:Provided the money for roads
4.Workers:Were paid wages to work
There You go (:
