Answer:
<em>Because immigration is a natural process and a policy of open immigration avoid many of the problems, costs and negatives effects of illegal immigration.</em>
Explanation:
In a country with open immigration people will not use of fraud to get inside the country or to get work, that way the state doesn’t need to spend so much money in securing borders or investigating frauds and illegal workers.
With open immigration the immigrants are able to participate in the economy and pay taxes as other citizens, these increase the states income and the opportunity for investors, if they are illegal they can’t open a legal business, as happened in past with the Chinese’s for many years in US. Or they won’t need social welfare because they can have an income, that way they don’t have to be under the state’s support or be in custody in prisons.
They can also respond to law and have some responsibilities as other citizens without having all the native’s rights, this creates a more equal situation than when they are illegally immigrating.
The President of the United States of America (POTUS) is the elected head of state <span>and head of government of the United States. The president leads the executive branch of the federal government and is the </span>commander-in-chief<span> of the United States Armed Forces,</span>
1.Research:Explore the websites provided to gather information on two landmark Supreme Court cases in order to compare the arguments for and against judicial restraint and judicial activism.
2.Write:Write an essay that compares and contrasts judicial activism and judicial restraint and presents your opinion on the debate surrounding these two philosophies.To get the best grade possible, follow the instructions in the assignment closely and answer all the questions completely. This assignment is worth 20 points.Use the provided websites to conduct research and answer the questions below. Your research will be critical to gathering the information necessary to write your essay. This section is worth 8 points.
1. Explain judicial restraint and the kinds of situations when it often comes into play. (1 point)Judicial restraint is where the judge limits the exercise of their own power and it comes into play when thejudge defers the issue to an elected official in the legislative or executive branches.
2. Explain judicial activism and the kinds of situations when it often comes into play. (1 point)Judicial activism is where the judge decides based on his/her opinion of what is best. These kinds of situations often occur when the judge tries to protect individual interests.
Info icon Subscribe to view the full document.
Subscribe to Unlock Right Arrow Icon
3. Explain the main arguments for and against judicial restraint. (1 point)For judicial restraintAgainst judicial restraintThe Constitution can only be interpreted by strict constructionist approachThe Constitution or laws made by legislature can be bague and be interpreted in different ways.
Compensation of Baltes's theory does the reflect.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
Balte studied the development of humans especially in the old age. He gave the theory of selection, optimization and compensation known as the SOC model. The theory studies how developmental success of old people takes place. Compensation is a process wherein the old aged or the elderly reduce their performance.
Here, Arthur Rubinstein uses compensation to make use of strategies. This is because he is not very active and performs in a slow manner. At all functional levels, he uses compensation to ensure that he is able to cope up with his status.
