Answer:
When he was arguing for the ratification of the Constitution, Alexander Hamilton wrote that the judiciary “will always be the least dangerous branch to the political rights of the Constitution,” in part because he believed the federal courts would stand above the political fray and act as a bulwark against tyranny from all directions.
But it’s hard to defend the Supreme Court on these grounds today.
As my colleague Matthew Yglesias has argued, the Court is now a blunt political instrument, used repeatedly to undermine outcomes of democratic governance — often on behalf of corporate interests. And the recent disaster that was the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation has further delegitimized the Court in the public’s mind.
So it’s perfectly reasonable to ask if we should abolish the Supreme Court, or at the very least strip the Court of its ability to overturn laws that it rules unconstitutional. If the Court is no longer a neutral arbiter of the law, if it’s gradually shape-shifting into a partisan weapon, then maybe it’s time to rethink its role in our constitutional system.
Answer:is alive
Explanation: because the animal or plant hasn't died yet
Answer:
African Americans experienced less because African Americans could not really fight back then we had to wait till the 15th ammendment
Explanation:
I'm only in 7th grade so hope this helps
Answer:
Unified coordination group
Explanation:
Unified coordination group has main three function:
1) formulated the coordination leadership
2) it form group of heads of emergency support functions
3) formulate the hierarchical structure for cooperative work within or outside the federal government
4) work as coordinating team for different agencies in the government
Answer:
parol evidence
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the admission of Brogan's testimony is most likely governed by the parol evidence rule. This rule created to prevent a party from introducing evidence before the agreement was made final in order to change the existing contract. Which is what Brogan is doing in this scenario by trying to release evidence about his age before the finalization of the contract.
