1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mr Goodwill [35]
3 years ago
11

What is the difference between reserved powers and concurrent powers?What is the difference between reserved powers and concurre

nt powers?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Vinvika [58]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Reserved powers

Federalism describes the system of shared governance between national ... both exclusive and concurrent powers, which help to explain the negotiation ... the Constitution envisioned that state governments, not the national government, ... Exclusive powers are those powers reserved to the federal government or the states.

You might be interested in
How has the Supreme Court influenced the process of incorporating the Bill of Rights? Explain how Palko and Duncan changed the S
malfutka [58]
<span>Sample response: Palko involved restricting incorporation of the Bill of Rights on the state level. In contrast, Duncan resulted in an expansion of incorporation when the conviction was overturned due to the lack of a jury trial.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP ILL PICK BRAINLIEST IF it's RIGHT!!
meriva

I would say different representatives, but same senators

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What actions can negatively impact your credit store
zzz [600]
Getting into a car crash and it's your fault
3 0
3 years ago
People of sub Sahara are least likely to move
murzikaleks [220]

Answer:

patterns of sub-Saharan African migration for the next thirty years. ... across a country will likely enable people to move while spatially concentrating ..... those least likely to move internationally (see Table. 1).

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Under the Supreme Court’s strict scrutiny standard, in order for a law or action that prevents a person from exercising a fundam
yanalaym [24]

Answer:

the law or action must be necessary to promote a compelling state interest and must be narrowly tailored to meet that interest.

Explanation:

Under the Supreme Court’s strict scrutiny standard, in order for a law or action that prevents a person from exercising a fundamental right to be constitutional, it must promote <u>a compelling state interest and must be narrowly tailored to meet that interest</u>.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • It has been determined that a tumor is in stage 2. what is the meaning of this finding
    12·1 answer
  • I need 5 question for the book treasure island for pages 1-40
    10·1 answer
  • What was Lincoln's position on slavery during the presidential campaign of 1860
    12·1 answer
  • Masked bandits might be more likely than unmasked bandits to physically injure their victims due to
    8·1 answer
  • Which sociological perspective revolves around the idea that society is made up of groups with competing interests?
    14·1 answer
  • Who was named after Louisiana
    8·1 answer
  • What was the most significant achievement of Piankhi's rule?
    10·1 answer
  • 2. "Population management is Indispanable<br>for development". Justify the statement<br>​
    6·1 answer
  • Where can you visit the real-life halloweentown from the 1998 disney movie?
    9·1 answer
  • Which explorer was very cruel to Native Americans?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!