<span>The organization that supervises internet addressing is "ICANN".
</span>ICANN stands for the "Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number", and it refers to a non-profit association in charge of organizing the support and strategies of a few databases identified with the namespaces of the Internet, guaranteeing the system's steady and secure operation.ICANN plays out the technical maintenance work of the Central Internet Address pools and DNS root zone registries in accordance with the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) work contract.
Answer:
The equipment's net book value on 12/31/2015 is $ 135000.
Explanation:
Net book value of the equipment on 12/31/2015 is given by:
Net book value = cost of the equipment - depreciation expense recognized until 12/31/2015
= $ 350000 - $ 215000
= $ 135000
Therefore, the equipment's net book value on 12/31/2015 is $ 135000.
Answer:
the general welfare will be the sum of consumer surplus and producer surplus.
Explanation:
The consumer and producer surplus assessment serves to measure the overall efficiency of the market, which in turn is associated with overall well-being. An efficient market is one in which both consumers and producers have the incentive to negotiate and effect trade.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the amount he or she is willing to pay and how much he or she actually pays for the product. This surplus is positive when the amount paid is less than the amount for which the consumer would be willing to pay.
Similarly, the producer's surplus is the difference between the market price and the price at which the seller is willing to produce and sell. When the producer's surplus is positive, it means that he sells the product for a price higher than the minimum value that would stimulate him to produce.
Thus, the general welfare will be the sum of consumer surplus and producer surplus.
Answer:
A Subjective performance evaluation is more feasible when evaluating jobs that cannot easily be evaluated by numbers, in finding problems such as ethical errors that objective evaluation cannot identify and in identifying the rate of achievement of work goals that cannot be recorded in an objective evaluation.
Explanation:
Though Objective evaluation has been the more favored form of evaluation for valid reasons, there are still situations where subjective performance evaluation does a better job in the workplace.
Some jobs for example, the job of an attorney, cannot easily be objectively evaluated. In this situation, it falls on the employer to evaluate the performance of the employee by using measurements like team play, professionalism and client service.
In objective analysis, some ethical approaches are overlooked and the achievement of the set goal is the major criterion for ratings. This affords employees the opportunity to use unethical means to achieve set targets and the objective performance evaluation skips it, leaving them safe and with high ratings. In subjective performance ratings however, the employer having the power to rate employers, could expose these unethical behaviors faster and actions, taken on them.
In the workplace, certain goals are set in overall goals, as a method to achieving the overall set target. In an objective performance rating, an employee could bypass these and still appear to have achieved the overall goal. An objective evaluation will miss this but a subjective evaluation could pick this out and make rating each employee based on these soft goals and overall goal achievable.
